TootsieFootsie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 24, 2012
- Messages
- 12,009
- Reaction score
- 76,510
DBM
Last edited:
I don't understand, why one owns a cell phone and doesn't use it for 9 months. What might be the trick behind this? There has to be a certain ruse, I believe.
MOO - So if the Foster Father knew nothing about it and therefore must not have been the person who made that disconnection, then it stands to reason that it would have been the Foster Mother who did it, and should have been questioned by Detectives on why. But if she knew nothing about it, then who!Hi FromGermany. It’s always seemed quite a strange to me, but perhaps for a different reason.
However ‘strange’ can also be quite innocent.
IMO the ‘terminology‘ being used of ‘phone’ is a tad misleading.
I don’t believe Police were referencing an actual ‘handset / phone’, but instead were talking about another ‘mobile number’ appearing in JS’s Telstra account - which showed no activity in the 9 mths it was connected.
(according to the comments in the article provided above by Detective Willy)
JS said he’d had the same number for 9 years.
He also said that he upgrades his iPhone version regularly.
It’s many years since my career in mobile technology however I think there’s still only 2 options to get a new version handset -
Buy 1 ‘outright’
or
do what many people often do and that’s get a ‘new contract’ which will provide a new phone / handset at a heavily subsidised price / certain plans will give a ‘free’ handset
I‘m wondering if JS previously always purchased his new version iPhones outright, however if finances got a bit tighter, perhaps that outlay wasn’t viable in a lump sum, and the decision was made to get another contract, throw the new SiM in the drawer & put old SIM in new Phone ( & pay the additional monthly fee for the new contract). If he didn’t manage the home finances he may not have even been aware.
Now I’ll go back to what about this seemed ‘strange’ to me:
it’s that it was disconnected after 9 months.
Imo, these contracts are minimum 12 months duration
So for me, I’m interested in why it was disconnected at that time, 3 days prior to their hurried & early Sydney departure - a disconnection that imo will have added sizeable fees on to the next phone bill.
anyway, all just my thoughts & opinions, as we chat around the collective tableand I hope everyone is keeping safe & well.
I don't understand, why one owns a cell phone and doesn't use it for 9 months.
And that would’ve been what FF meant when he said was it her data thingy. But Police should’ve known that If they actually investigated the sims with network. I think perhaps they just asked questions & accepted the answers.It wasn't a phone, it was a SIM card.
SIM cards are also used in other items - where people don't even know the SIM number, and make no calls.
For example, I disconnected a SIM card on a company phone account that had no activity for months (or ever). Turns out it was a SIM card that a staff member had in their iPad.
We have no idea if they have moved on from FA at all. He didn’t provide an alibi, so he would still be on their list. They can say whatever they like to the public (ie - this is our POI) and be investigating someone else altogether.
And they especially liked the answer "No idea."And that would’ve been what FF meant when he said was it her data thingy. But Police should’ve known that If they actually investigated the sims with network. I think perhaps they just asked questions & accepted the answers.
Well, that's true and all computer activity using the sim card does not show as activity on a phone. Unless the sim is located it can't be shown what it was used for.... it's not evidence but an interesting line of inquiry. If it was used in a computer in relation to WT's disappearance then it could indicate some long term planning? I'm not posing this as a fact, just a scenario. IMOIt wasn't a phone, it was a SIM card.
SIM cards are also used in other items - where people don't even know the SIM number, and make no calls.
For example, I disconnected a SIM card on a company phone account that had no activity for months (or ever). Turns out it was a SIM card that a staff member had in their iPad.
Well, that's true and all computer activity using the sim card does not show as activity on a phone. Unless the sim is located it can't be shown what it was used for.... it's not evidence but an interesting line of inquiry. If it was used in a computer in relation to WT's disappearance then it could indicate some long term planning? I'm not posing this as a fact, just a scenario. IMO
JMO, but I think Police could subpoena the mobile network / ISP for activity on a SIM card that may be in a mobile device such as iPAD or tablet.Well, that's true and all computer activity using the sim card does not show as activity on a phone. Unless the sim is located it can't be shown what it was used for.... it's not evidence but an interesting line of inquiry. If it was used in a computer in relation to WT's disappearance then it could indicate some long term planning? I'm not posing this as a fact, just a scenario. IMO
so sad reading all that, poor little boy![]()
William Tyrrell foster father quizzed over mystery phone
William Tyrrell's foster father was interrogated about a mystery phone registered in his name which was disconnected just three days before his foster son vanished.www.dailymail.co.uk
I can’t say I recall reading this before
Are they going to expect Spedding to pay back a million and a half bucks?A $1.5 million award to Bill Spedding over trumped-up historical sexual assault allegations brought during the investigation into William Tyrrell's disappearance should be overturned, an appeals court has been told.
Without naming individuals in the ODPP, it was impossible to assess their state of mind and determine whether they maliciously pursued the case against Spedding, the court was told.
There was also no evidence to suggest the director or those under him were colluding with police officers
Harrison also erred by finding the DPP was not reasonable in bringing the sexual assault charges against Spedding in April 2015 or for continuing with the case.
The hearing continues.
![]()
Judge wrong to award $1.5m to Bill Spedding, court told
www.9news.com.au
Are they going to expect Spedding to pay back a million and a half bucks?
NoAre they going to expect Spedding to pay back a million and a half bucks?