SouthAussie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 29,840
- Reaction score
- 182,164
With all due respect SA, there was a time when it could have accurately been stated that ‘the FF has never been a POI ‘.
iMO, this investigation was a clu$&r fu#k from the beginning, and has become increasingly so as the years have progressed.
I actually find these half-baked, tax payer funded court proceedings to be embarrassing. IMO our investigations teams should have more self-respect & professionalism than to present in the way they do - totally unprepared to Win.
The reality is that Justice will be served, be it in this life or the next. If Police don’t have the necessary answers now, stop wasting $$ and move on. No shortage of crimes to solve!
Yes, Warsh. I was trying to nicely point out that (on WS) we are not allowed to accuse people if they have not been named as a POI.
And I think that there is plenty of confirmation of where FD was and what he was doing. Hence, he has never been named as a POI.
With regard to FM, I think they had to do the re-investigation (though the police-inspired publicity leaves them in an awkward situation now) because we had read that there was disagreement among the police, so the Coroner wanted confirmation that there is no evidence to show that FM was involved.
imo
Last edited: