and the foster parents should be ashamed of themselves too for abusing the child
We don’t actually know if those surveillance devices assisted Police in the investigation of William’s case, or not?
Since the time of the surveillance, Police have recommended charges to the OPDD for the FM, so it is possible that some information was useful??
IMO
I think, that the presence of the bio sister of the disappeared child= little W in the household was the requirement for a successful investigation. Without little L less opportunity for slipping-ups (re William) by the FFC or MFC and much less chance, the damn secrets from 2014 could be recorded.so if a foster child has a support person they can confide in, what happens if the child accuses their foster family of hurting them? does the supporter believe the child or the family, and wouldnt the possible outcome of that make the child fearful of reporting?
also with L, couldnt the surveillance team have removed her on the pretence a teacher had noticed bruising etc, and carried on with their surveillance?
i guess its probably not as simple as that with all the departments involved though?
I thought for a long time, that stalking and intimidation of L happened (also?) after L was taken away from the FP. Now it seems, all had only happened, when little L was still a foster child living in the FP-household. I am confused by it.Can anyone remember or link the article or news segment where Detective Ogilvy re approached the child protection unit as he was concerned about the escalation in the intimidation behaviours please???
A detective from that unit also gave evidence this week …… specifically relating to the intimidation charges / behaviours …
For the life of me, I just can’t find where I read or heard that ….
Many thanks.
IMO
There is a chance, that the Coroner recommended going via the ODPP as they have been operating under her direction since the inquest closed.IMO - if they had anything incriminating, charges would not have to be referred to the DPP, they would have been charged already. That child had to go through all of that just for them to "recommend" charges without actually charging anyone?
I thought for a long time, that stalking and intimidation of L happened (also?) after L was taken away from the FP. Now it seems, all had only happened, when little L was still a foster child living in the FP-household. I am confused by it.![]()
JMO - What sort of person is John Stratton SC to say:
And what sort of people allow their lawyers to make such statements to undermine a child they pretty much raised and once considered their own! (Or at least they called themselves their family) MooJMO - What sort of person is John Stratton SC to say:
Child 'scared' after Tyrrell foster dad's alleged abuse
"The woman's barrister, John Stratton SC, suggested the assault and intimidation allegations were not serious enough to warrant investigation by specialist police."
And didn’t he also say it was a normal household!
Is there a way we could collate here?I wish a journalist would publish an Article setting out all of the assault/intimidation/stalking/teacher reporting/removal consecutively in date order of occurrence.
BBMSomehow they have 6 incidents within 2 charges of "stalking and intimidation" for FM. John Stratton has asked they be set out more clearly, prior to the December court date.
BBM
SA do you have a link for the 6 incidents they are referring to, with the intimidation charges please?
Thanks
Can anyone remember or link the article or news segment where Detective Ogilvy re approached the child protection unit as he was concerned about the escalation in the intimidation behaviours please???
A detective from that unit also gave evidence this week …… specifically relating to the intimidation charges / behaviours …
For the life of me, I just can’t find where I read or heard that ….
Many thanks.
IMO
What do we think is the purpose of the hearing in December? I have been thinking that I haven't seen much if anything from MFC's barrister. Perhaps in December there will be a focus on the charges against him.FM has plead guilty to those two assault charges, however they are being heard in conjunction with the intimidation and stalking charges ….
So the penalties will be decided on the combined charges ….
There is further hearing in December, and Magistrate has indicated a verdict will be given in February 2024. (Sometimes there is further delay until the sentence is handed down after the verdict)
So we won’t know the outcome until at least Feb 2024.
The magistrate ordered written submissions from the parties before returning to court in December with plans to deliver a judgment in February.
![]()
Tears as child taken from Tyrrell foster mum's care
Missing toddler William Tyrrell's former foster mother told a child being removed from her care that it wasn't the youngster's fault, a court has heard.www.perthnow.com.au
IMO
so if a foster child has a support person they can confide in, what happens if the child accuses their foster family of hurting them? does the supporter believe the child or the family, and wouldnt the possible outcome of that make the child fearful of reporting?
also with L, couldnt the surveillance team have removed her on the pretence a teacher had noticed bruising etc, and carried on with their surveillance?
i guess its probably not as simple as that with all the departments involved though?
I’m not an expert on the foster system but I would assume a case worker would check in with the children at least every few months. How comprehensive these checks were, or if they were happening regularly in reality is a different question.
The FCs had been able to pull the wool so to speak for a long time. I’m sure they would have been able to talk their way out of a paper bag to any accusations L or any other children may have raised with a case worker. Look at how GJ was convinced they were fantastic people etc.
Also, kids naturally try to protect their parents and realistically, they had care of L since she was so young, I’m sure they felt like they were her parents. L may have denied anything for a while, or may have been threatened by the FCs not to say anything.
And imo people that physically hurt kids know to do it where injuries aren’t visible. For injuries that are visible they always seem to have an excuse for them.
All moo
That’s what breaks my heart bear.
<modsnip: no link/rumor>
Thanks for the link SA.There is an explanation of those incidents in this article.
He argued five of the six allegations of intimidation - which constitute the two intimidation charges - did not meet the criteria of the offences.