B. Conway Poll - Good Attorney or all spin

Good Attorney or all spin?

  • I don't like the A's behavior during this, but I do like the new attorney

    Votes: 159 70.0%
  • B. He is only interested in legal spin and public exposure

    Votes: 68 30.0%

  • Total voters
    227
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Since the day that BC said during a interview that "his clients have always told the truth and their love for their daughter will not change that", I have come to the conclusion that either:

He is incompetent
He thinks everyone else is stupid
He is a liar
He doesn't get cable and can't figure out how to work Youtube

bold is mine

ADHDkitten.gif
 
Since the day that BC said during a interview that "his clients have always told the truth and their love for their daughter will not change that", I have come to the conclusion that either:

He is incompetent
He thinks everyone else is stupid
He is a liar
He doesn't get cable and can't figure out how to work Youtube

BBM, Well then, I say he's qualified to join the defense team!! :)
 
Article: http://www.wesh.com/news/21654855/detail.html

Former Meter Reader Found Remains Of Slain Toddler, Caylee Anthony
POSTED: 3:38 pm EST November 18, 2009
UPDATED: 4:19 pm EST November 18, 2009
<snipped>

His attorney told WESH 2 Thursday that Kronk has some things in his past he's not proud of, but none of that has any bearing on his discovery of Caylee's remains or that he's been truthful about how it occurred.
_________________________________________________________

Anthonys Say They Only Want Truth From Kronk

The Anthonys' attorney (Brad Conway) said Kronk's personal life and the circumstances of discovering the remains are different things. George and Cindy Anthony's attorney said all they want is the truth from Kronk and not dirt about his past.

"They have been vilified unfairly. They know what it's like to be under a microscope unfairly and they don't want that to happen to someone who found their granddaughter," attorney Brad Conway said."




This is such a barefaced, pointless lie from Brad Conway that it's not just disgusting, it's also a little insulting to the intelligence.

Based on a series of e-mails released in a recent document dump, Cindy has been vigorously digging for dirt on Roy Kronk's personal life, and has gone so far as to have Dominic Casey question Kronk's former brother-and-sister-in-law about Kronk's relationship with his dead wife! Brad Conway was copied in on many of these e-mails.

http://www.clickorlando.com/download/2009/0929/21146565.pdf

(Begins at hand-numbered page 8048)
Yea!! Someone posted about this...has anyone taken a look at the news updates today? There's a new member of the defense team hired to do just that...dig up dirt. Did the As think that by publicly announcing their distaste for this ahead of the public meeting Mr. Smith that we'd ignore the fact that the defense is doing just that?! (Oh...sure, they're in no way tied to the defense.)
 
This guy-
http://www.mortsmith.com/
of course it is the defense team he is on- the Anthonys are not connected in any way.... they don't want any more dirty tricks :sick:
 
This guy-
http://www.mortsmith.com/
of course it is the defense team he is on- the Anthonys are not connected in any way.... they don't want any more dirty tricks :sick:

His bio makes it look like he is connected to or knows AL. Maybe she thinks that, given the botching JB/DC did on this, she needs to retrace some steps using a true professional and come to her own conclusions. She is on record as not being fond of SODDI angles, so this may just be to tie up loose ends, but who knows? I think the spin cycle is permanently on.
 
His bio makes it look like he is connected to or knows AL. Maybe she thinks that, given the botching JB/DC did on this, she needs to retrace some steps using a true professional and come to her own conclusions. She is on record as not being fond of SODDI angles, so this may just be to tie up loose ends, but who knows? I think the spin cycle is permanently on.
Yup...work at the same school.
 
Mort Smith teaches at Depaul and has participated in seminars with AL. They most certainly know eachother and are professionally involved. Some of his specialties include "witness prep, locate, and interview". Considering the fact the AL has been retained to get the death penalty OFF the table (her job is NOT to prove innocence) it would be safe IMO to assume that Mr. Smith will be doing a lot of preliminary bus driving in an effort to "save KC". In fact.... I would bet that he has visited WS or has someone doing that for him.

I assume it os OK to post first and last names as he is an involved party much like JB and AL.
 
Yup...work at the same school.

I just posted a question in the Procedures and Legal thread. Is this normal for a PI to attend a deposition presuming he was sitting in on the proceedings. Or was he just there for intimidation purposes??
 
I just posted a question in the Procedures and Legal thread. Is this normal for a PI to attend a deposition presuming he was sitting in on the proceedings. Or was he just there for intimidation purposes??
A very good question...I guess because he works for the law firm he is allowed?
 
I hate the fact that BC is getting celebrity cases now (he is representing one of the Tiger Woods hoochies), and that JB weighed in on Geraldo as a Tiger Woods correspondent...gag me with a giant ladle.
JB has not won the case here, so I am not sure why Geraldo loves him so much, and BC! Think really hard and please tell me what exactly he has done in this case that would gain him the reputation of top notch attorney?
 
I refuse to watch Geraldo because of his JB pandering. It makes me positively nauseous. If I need an update on the case I come here.
 
Mort Smith teaches at Depaul and has participated in seminars with AL. They most certainly know eachother and are professionally involved. Some of his specialties include "witness prep, locate, and interview". Considering the fact the AL has been retained to get the death penalty OFF the table (her job is NOT to prove innocence) it would be safe IMO to assume that Mr. Smith will be doing a lot of preliminary bus driving in an effort to "save KC". In fact.... I would bet that he has visited WS or has someone doing that for him.

I assume it os OK to post first and last names as he is an involved party much like JB and AL.

He is probably what is known as a "Mitigation Specialist" in death penalty circles, meaning he focuses on finding information that will be beneficial to a client during the penalty phase - when mitigation is admissible.
 
He is probably what is known as a "Mitigation Specialist" in death penalty circles, meaning he focuses on finding information that will be beneficial to a client during the penalty phase - when mitigation is admissible.

Thanks Richard!
Wow, it sure takes a lot of high profile mitigation experts to be involved so early on....and for a completely innocent client at that. :innocent:
It's kind of sad really. If KC was even 1/4 of the 'Mother of the year' her Mommy claims her to be, her life well lived, by normal standards would be mitigation enough, wouldn't it?
 
Thank you Patty G!:aktion033:
BC flew to NY for this? Betcha there are more interviews lined up!:waitasec:
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o20JrL9DX24[/ame]
No lies? No inconsistencies? Come on!!:banghead:
 
Thank you Patty G!:aktion033:
BC flew to NY for this? Betcha there are more interviews lined up!:waitasec:
No lies? No inconsistencies? Come on!!:banghead:

I transcribed Brad's statement of note. It is at 4:48:

I've represented them for a year now and certainly in my representation they have not made any inconsistent statements. They have not lied. They've been truthful at every turn. And prior to my entry into the case, I believe that they also gave evidence, and were truthful at every turn.
 
I transcribed Brad's statement of note. It is at 4:48:

I've represented them for a year now and certainly in my representation they have not made any inconsistent statements. They have not lied. They've been truthful at every turn. And prior to my entry into the case, I believe that they also gave evidence, and were truthful at every turn.

All I can do is :banghead: after hearing Brad this morning.
 
All I can do is :banghead: after hearing Brad this morning.

They haven't lied? How about when CA was sitting right next to him lying on LKL? Brad talked about how OCSO took pics of the diary when they executed the search warrant-which is correct...
But then, IIRC, CA puts her arm accross his chest, says "no," and goes on to explain that police surreptitiously took that picture and leaked it.
Brad just looked at her funny and went with her flow.

From the show:


KING: Help me here, Brad, because that's supposed to be key evidence here.

CONWAY: Larry, I've got custody of that diary. That was written in 2003, June 21st, two years before Caylee was even born.

KING: Who introduced it? Who brought this to the public?

CONWAY: That was disclosed along with the state's discovery.

KING: Why would the prosecutor issue something that was two years before the baby was born?

CONWAY: Because it was released with the discovery.

C. ANTHONY: No, it wasn't, Brad. It wasn't. Let me explain. The prosecutor didn't have that diary, didn't look at the diary. We had it. Someone at the Sheriff's department took a picture of the diary while they were in our house. We have possession of the diary. And leaked it to the media, and the media ran with it.

And then, a few weeks later, Brad showed the state's attorney's office the diary. They don't want it, because it's not evidence.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
196
Guests online
4,403
Total visitors
4,599

Forum statistics

Threads
592,357
Messages
17,967,965
Members
228,754
Latest member
Annie151
Back
Top