Forgive me in advance and humor me, please. It has recently occurred to me that just PERHAPS this case is convoluted not only because of everything leading up to this point so far as press, documentaries, accusations, etc... Is it possible that WM3 supporters AND nons could all be right to a certain degree? Perhaps LE was "on to something" but just didn't fit the pieces together appropriately, in the way they actually happened... Guess what I'm suggesting is this -- Jason Baldwin TOTALLY innocent -- guilty by association as the close friend of Echols Misskelly -- an unwilling witness (and possible participant) in the crime -- something led LE to him -- how much of his GUIDED AND COERCED CONFESSION is true, we may never know - however, based on a combination of physical evidence alongside his "confession," it makes me wonder if he didn't know something.... Perhaps he did, in fact, chase down Moore -- perhaps he did this out of fear for his own life? (as family/friends stated he didn't like Echols, preferred not to be around him) Damien was mentally ill, clearly, as evidence shows -- does that make him guilty? No. Someone to be scrutinized? Yes. There is something that just doesn't smell right to me when it comes to the "all or nothing"... there's something that just doesn't sit right -- they might not all three be guilty, but just perhaps one or two of them are? jmo... thoughts???