I agree. I've written several hypotheticals, since I read the recent article.
I find it interesting that no one has gone for the reward offered after all these years. It's a pretty healthy sum to have sat there for a decade.
The way I read the above article, I felt it was almost written as if to say this reward was a 'new' thing, ie "
is being offered nearly 10 years after the disappearance".. even though many years ago there had already been a $50K reward offered. To my knowledge, I couldn't find anything from the 'original' reward that said 'who' was putting up the money, just that 'one of the daughters', or 'the daughters', were funding it. Now they are specifying that it is Roberta. (Please enlighten me if I am mistaken on this point).
Is it possible the original $50K reward was removed, and now has been reinstated?
Was Roberta the original funder of the reward, or was it more a shared initiative with her other sisters?
I wonder why it is just the *one* daughter at this time who is funding the reward offer? If it were me, I believe I would want to offer something (and especially considering I was presumably one of the beneficiaries of the healthy estate from the missing person in question), however even if I didn't *want* to, I would most certainly feel obligated to share that gesture with my sibling. jmo.