ú

CA - Joey, Summer, Gianni, Joseph Jr McStay Murders - Feb 4th 2010 #19

Discussion in 'Trials' started by Tricia, Jan 9, 2019.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. la2cabo

    la2cabo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,115
    Likes Received:
    5,606
    Trophy Points:
    113
    At least you're able to listen. My speakers decided to take a dive and I haven't bought new ones yet. Very, very frustrating. I'm curious to see how the DT handles this new evidence. As you know I don't think they truly wanted to find DK and put him on the stand but we'll have to see how it all unfolds.
     
    geevee and Karinna like this.
  2. missy1974

    missy1974 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    8,684
    Likes Received:
    20,546
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If I had been smart, I would have charged my bluetooth headphones so I could listen! LOL Earlier when I was listening my internet decided to take a poo, I was so mad LOL That was 2o minutes of listening I missed out on haha
     
  3. Mony Mony

    Mony Mony Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,497
    Likes Received:
    5,442
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Per Lauren, the private dick did not leave his contact information when he spoke to her mom, so......IMO he did not really want to find anyone.

    IMO MOO etc etc
     
  4. Karinna

    Karinna Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    7,933
    Likes Received:
    9,033
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They can't produce a BP if DK threw it away. I don't see any reason not to find this witness as being credible. We still don't know what else the PT has in that regard either.
     
  5. Bernina

    Bernina Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    11,384
    Likes Received:
    5,671
    Trophy Points:
    113
    At this point, I don't think some people would believe DK was in Hawaii no matter how much evidence was produced. The DT is going to challenge everything about DK instead of providing a solid alibi for their client.
    As a juror, I'd be wondering why CM DOESN'T have an alibi for the crucial days needed. I'd wonder why he's NOT taking the stand. Sure, he doesn't have to take the stand, but his audio and video "testimony" is ridiculous.
     
  6. katydid23

    katydid23 Verified Juanette

    Messages:
    52,625
    Likes Received:
    59,016
    Trophy Points:
    113
    After Rudin was done, and the tweets said the next witness was Lauren Knowles my heart sank. I thought the defense team got his ex girlfriend to throw DK under the bus. I was so worried. :eek:

    I couldn't believe it when I saw her boarding pass and the dates of the trip, etc. :)

    I know the DT will still try to spin it. But at this point, I don't think it will be convincing.
     
    KALI, QueenBofOB, Bernina and 7 others like this.
  7. MrsPC

    MrsPC Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,579
    Likes Received:
    2,591
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So who are the next witnesses for the defense tomorrow?
     
    QueenBofOB, oceanblueeyes and Karinna like this.
  8. katydid23

    katydid23 Verified Juanette

    Messages:
    52,625
    Likes Received:
    59,016
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I am dying to find out.

    Any guesses? It could be people they are recalling from the state's case. Or one of his family or friends ? Or an 'expert' they hadn't called yet.

    I dont think their cell phone expert testified, did they?
     
  9. MrsPC

    MrsPC Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,579
    Likes Received:
    2,591
    Trophy Points:
    113
    right...no phone/ping expert yet.
     
  10. Force Ten

    Force Ten Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,983
    Likes Received:
    9,691
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It is obvious now he was truthful all along. I can imagine him saying Screw them, I don't need to produce or prove anything, I was in Hawaii. End of story. Lauren probably contacted the prosecution on his behalf to set the record straight. But there are those who will claim that the picture could have been taken at any time before, even years, and uploaded from Hawaii Feb 4th as a cover. We know this is coming. It's so predictable.
     
  11. katydid23

    katydid23 Verified Juanette

    Messages:
    52,625
    Likes Received:
    59,016
    Trophy Points:
    113

    If he had gone there to create a fake alibi, he would have the boa5ding passes of the 'cover flight.' And he would have a lot of pictures because he would make sure people took pix of them, before he snuck back to Cali.
     
  12. missy1974

    missy1974 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    8,684
    Likes Received:
    20,546
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOL Ok... Dr. Rudin has not disappointed me at all... his comments here and there are funny LOL He tells Imes, I might be a senior citizen but I remember haha

    But my new favourite comment from him...

    after an objection from Maline, saying he's misleading the witness and the juror's, Judge says the witness is quite able to explain what his exhibits show….

    Dr. Rudin: yes, thank you, I think Mr. Imes is a little confused and I understand.

    :D:D:D:D:D

    Whoever is recording this for L&C, you can hear her start laughing... and I know I shouldn't, but I am still laughing, I have rewound it just to hear it again a few times LOL
     
    QueenBofOB, Bernina, la2cabo and 4 others like this.
  13. smr

    smr Former Member

    Messages:
    924
    Likes Received:
    1,806
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Time mark?
     
  14. katydid23

    katydid23 Verified Juanette

    Messages:
    52,625
    Likes Received:
    59,016
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Rudin was amusing, but in the end, he left things up in the air. He would not definitively 'exclude' the white truck. He would lean towards a 'rejection', but would leave it open to a change of opinion with more data, because he does not feel there was ample data to determine a final decision.

    So it was really indecisive, after 2 days of testimony.
     
    LadyL, QueenBofOB, MrsPC and 7 others like this.
  15. missy1974

    missy1974 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    8,684
    Likes Received:
    20,546
    Trophy Points:
    113
    about 19:30 of Part 4

    And then the judge asks him to clarify about what Imes was "confused" about... Imes starts questioning him again and he says "well, why don't you bring that picture because you just confused the jury" LOL at about 23:30. Imes just ignores him :D
     
    LadyL and smr like this.
  16. smr

    smr Former Member

    Messages:
    924
    Likes Received:
    1,806
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Rudin and Stutchman are the best :cool:
     
  17. smr

    smr Former Member

    Messages:
    924
    Likes Received:
    1,806
    Trophy Points:
    93
    "That's the way mathematicians talk about it."
     
    Last edited: May 23, 2019
  18. missy1974

    missy1974 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    8,684
    Likes Received:
    20,546
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well, I'm not done listening, but this is what he said yesterday. He wanted to do the live reprojection or whatever. He said they have the truck, they have the camera still, so why not do it? He is "dazzled" that neither side wants to, it would have eliminated theories and would have been a definitive answer. If I recall correctly, this is what Liscio said as well.
     
    MsFacetious likes this.
  19. smr

    smr Former Member

    Messages:
    924
    Likes Received:
    1,806
    Trophy Points:
    93
    bbm
    She laughed from 19:45-20:07 :D, then Imes had the balls to ask the next question.
     
  20. katydid23

    katydid23 Verified Juanette

    Messages:
    52,625
    Likes Received:
    59,016
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think that is a ridiculous idea. Who knows what kind of changes the truck has gone through in past 9 years? Different battery, different light panels, bulbs etc etc.

    And you could never duplicate the exact conditions of the original footage, so it wouldn't be totally accurate.

    You have no idea what the camera has been through and how different it might be now too. You cannot compare the footage from 9 years ago to something you 'recreate' this many years later.

    Even the driveway and the surrounding environment, lights, etc, will be very different.

    It would be foolhardy for either side to agree to such a stunt.

    It would not be a definitive answer as to the vehicle in the footage from 9 years ago.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page



  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice