The following timeline is obscure to me. The Wiki article on her murder says she met Jean while working at the Post Office in Toronto. If correct at what period was she seen at Cafe Image etc. in Montreal? How long did this Cafe Image period last and how long did the job in Toronto period last? When were they? The Wiki article says Jean I had a "slight" French accent and repeats the fact or notion that he was a med student. It is tough to get a sense of the timeline and it is crucial. Also the boyfriend shown in the TV doc discussed here.....who is that and again what time period are we talking about with him?
When Reet ran away from home when she was 16 where did she go? Toronto? Also and being deliberately obscure here is there a link between that disappearance (still in the age when girls were disappeared due to moral probity when consequences of relationships occured) and (re hypothetical paternity) the fellow who went to check on her in LA?
The Wiki article seems to be coming from the perspective of the family and friends and nothing wrong with that. It has very good references/citations. It is interesting that they for no good reason (?) tend to obscure the identity of the person who went to check on her in LA. If so why?
Also when Jean II meets G. Green in Montreal he says she left after a couple of weeks suggesting that they were till living there. So shouldn't the person who went to check on Reet in LA have talked to one or both of the Jeans? The article says the person going to check on her was told she had moved out several weeks earlier. So unless unless the Jeans had moved out as well this is likely to have been them. Because if she had moved in with the Jeans presumably she would be subletting, paying them not the landlord?
When Reet ran away from home when she was 16 where did she go? Toronto? Also and being deliberately obscure here is there a link between that disappearance (still in the age when girls were disappeared due to moral probity when consequences of relationships occured) and (re hypothetical paternity) the fellow who went to check on her in LA?
The Wiki article seems to be coming from the perspective of the family and friends and nothing wrong with that. It has very good references/citations. It is interesting that they for no good reason (?) tend to obscure the identity of the person who went to check on her in LA. If so why?
Also when Jean II meets G. Green in Montreal he says she left after a couple of weeks suggesting that they were till living there. So shouldn't the person who went to check on Reet in LA have talked to one or both of the Jeans? The article says the person going to check on her was told she had moved out several weeks earlier. So unless unless the Jeans had moved out as well this is likely to have been them. Because if she had moved in with the Jeans presumably she would be subletting, paying them not the landlord?
Last edited: