CA CA - Rosalind Giles, 36, Los Angeles, 10 January 1991

[Melt71]

www.doenetwork.org/cases/857dfca.html

Name: Rosalind Giles
Case Classification: Endangered Missing
Missing Since: January 10, 1991
Location Last Seen: Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California.

Physical Description​

Date of Birth: August 17, 1964
Age: 36 years old
Race: Black
Gender: Female
Height: 5'1 (153 cm.)
Weight: 115 lbs (52 kg.)
Hair Color: Black
Eye Color: Brown
Nickname/Alias: Roz Giles
Distinguishing Marks/Features: She has a scar on her neck and a scar on right shoulder.

Identifiers​

Dentals: Not available
Fingerprints: Unknown
DNA: Unknown

Clothing & Personal Items​

Clothing: Unknown
Jewelry: Unknown
Additional Personal Items: Unknown

Circumstances of Disappearance​

Giles was last seen January 10, 1991 in Los Angeles, CA.
She was known to be involved in drugs and prostitution. Foul play is feared.

Investigating Agency(s)​

Agency Name: Los Angeles Police Department
Agency Contact Person: N/A
Agency Phone Number: 213-485-5381
Agency E-Mail: N/A
Agency Case Number: 91-1307057

NCIC Case Number: M-479681517

Information Source(s)​

California Department of Justice

 

[Melt71]

Rosalind is not in Namus.

I have suggested her as a possible match to UP5692
www.websleuths.com/forums/threads/wa-lakewood-blkfem-30-45-up5692-clothes-jun95.459805/

 

[Icso896]

I was just advised that she has been identified as the Salton Sea Jane Doe that was found on 2/13/1991 through fingerprints. Hopefully if she has family they have been notified or they can contact the Imperial County Sheriff’s Office.

 

[Melt71]

I was just advised that she has been identified as the Salton Sea Jane Doe that was found on 2/13/1991 through fingerprints. Hopefully if she has family they have been notified or they can contact the Imperial County Sheriff’s Office.

Hopefully LE was able to connect with the person or organisation that originally declared Rosalind tk ve missing.

If ID is confirmed then RIP Rosalind.

 

[Crimhorra]

No systems have been updated with that information, unfortunately.