- Oct 31, 2011
- Reaction score
I don't understand why everyone thinks the texts/ lunch scenario is so odd or suspicious. My husband works in the field sometimes and if his project was going to bring him even remotely near our house I might think to to text him and try to meet him home for lunch at the same time. If he didn't respond, well then I would just figure he was too busy. And then if he texted me at 1:30 saying he wouldn't make it I would just think 'okay, well at it was nice of him to let me know.'
If KP hadn't texted back at all - well then we would probably consider that rude or a red flag. Plus, he then also told her it would be a late day. I don't know if 5pm was a late day - maybe the last appt got canceled or the 2nd to last ran long and they had to reschedule the last appt to the next day (I have had BB deliver appliances a day late).
My point being - all of this doesn't have to be so concrete or black or white. Things happen - and there really is a simple explanation for why things may have happened the way they did. I would rather get a late text from my husband than no text...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It bothers me too.One thing that it could possibly be was that she sent it because she was under duress or as a trying to send an SOS in sight of her abductors. In the Mansion Murders case in DC rather elaborate things were done to have the hostages send messages to either keep others away or to lure others to be captured. The text could have been sent by abductors or by her as a coded message depending on the circumstances. I'd really like to know how common or unusual such a text was. It bothers me that the wide range of hours she was reported t bothers me that there was a wide range of hours she was reported by neighborby neighbors as being seen, which I think whether this was something voluntary or involuntary that the text may be significant.
I have been thinking about his response text. She texts & asks are you coming home for lunch around 10:30 am. (From my previous posts, you will know I think this odd). His response 3 hours later (we know why so late, he said it was because phone was in the car) says he won't be home for lunch & he would be home late.
A. Did he expect her to be standing around waiting to serve him lunch, on standby for 3 hours? If she was a woman with a routine, as it has been stated over & over again, this doesn't fit. Why would he think she's was waiting to serve him lunch at 1:30, how would she then fit in a long run, shower & go get the kids from daycare in town?
B. He is the main bread winner, working half days or part time wo uld be a financial strain.
It bothers me too.
I'm confused by the timeline of when she was seen jogging. In one MSM article her husband states that he believes she headed out for her jog around 11:00am, shortly after the text about lunch. But witnesses saw her jogging around 2pm. Unless she normally jogs for 3 hours, which seems excessive, either her husband is wrong to assume she headed out before lunch, or the witnesses are getting her mixed up with someone else/recalling the wrong day.
Norcalnative, I agree. Although we ALL have our own ways of reacting and wording.
I can't see ANYONE replying the simple "No, it's going to be a late day," 3 hours later. Even if he happen to have a 2:00p.m. lunch. Wouldn't a logical text back be, " I'm sorry I missed you text," (Even though she knows he cant bring his phone in) or perhaps, "Obviously I couldn't make it babe." It doesn't even make sense. And when things don't make sense it raises A LOT of suspicion.
What if she didn't even text, "Are you coming home?" Ex. Pre-planned. Buying anyone time. (I'm not accusing the husband.) Even if it was her deciding to act out of character, in orded to successfully throw people off, so it wouldn't appear she left on her own. 90 percent of the time when things don't add up and make logical sense there's a reason why..and behind those questions of why. Are always lies. In this case I see major lies.
It's quite obvious we don't know much, or close to the whole story..and I believe there's a reason behind why.
I've followed thousands of missing person cases, runaways, suicides in my line of work. Studied psychology/sociology for multiple years.
But still it's...
Just my opinion.
Do I understand you that you said the Best Buy techs work in pairs?
That would be even more unusual for KP to come home for lunch...
B. He is the main bread winner, working half days or part time would be a financial strain.
Of they very few suicides of people I knew there was ZERO indication that they were going to kill themselves.I work with someone who went to school with Leanne. No signs whatsoever so my thought process is even the nearest and dearest often don't know what's truly going on within someone - especially if said person reaches the point of really wanting to end it all, walk away from it all. MOO is by that point they don't want to be stopped.
It took me forever to get through this thread, but the search being halted leads me to believe something was found on her phone/emails - deleted or not.
She had a pretty good position with ATT and it seems she worked until recently. Does anyone know when she left and why? Could unemployment be an issue? She might have continued to use child care to hold her slot until she went back to work, and keep the children in a routine. I also noticed her online stores advertised a lot of att swag but also SIM cards. Seems that would be competing with att stores. Seems her bosses might not like that. And what is her source for this att stuff?