All of this simply points at my suspicions all along.
A) She was grabbed where she was because it was an area hidden from view. Or......
B) She was grabbed where she was because the people living around there weren't normally home because they work for a living.
C) A lure or ploy was used to get her to stop jogging for a minute and focus her attention on something else under false pretenses. Most likely this would have been accomplished by parking a vehicle on the side of the road
in advance of her running down that road. As she is running by the vehicle, the abduction occurs. The earbuds would have been ripped free from the mp3 player by the initial confrontation, the phone would have been thrown out the window by the abductor after she was in the vehicle further down the road.
This was a premeditated and targeted abduction, and the person responsible had it planned out methodically. No eye witnesses, no cameras, no tire tracks, no blood, no screams or signs of a struggle.
It was done on hard terrain and sheltered from the view of dozens of local residents.
This guy lives right there in the neighborhood............or works in the area doing something like landscaping. How are they going to figure it out ? Dunno.
I made up a zoom-able map this morning showing her travel path and the general area. Also, I noted an area that needs to be heavily searched. Whether it has or not is unknown. If all they have done is send up drones and helicopters, they might want to consider a foot search.
Map:
https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?...l=40.698228201913395,-122.30406225551684&z=15
