Canada - Barry, 75, & Honey Sherman, 70, found dead, Toronto, 15 Dec 2017 #15

Discussion in 'Crimes in the News' started by dotr, Dec 15, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. deugirtni

    deugirtni Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,281
    Likes Received:
    22,713
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If the manner of death and staging made it obvious they were killed with anger and hatred, I would think police may have presumed right away that the couple were murdered. But we are led to believe there was something at the crimescene trying to be so convincing as to lead police instead in the direction of a murder/suicide determination (whether or not police actually fell for that). So therefore, if the killer(s) staged it to appear as M/S, it could very well have been purely financial (with a stick or two of mental illness thrown in). imo.
     


  2. WINDSOR

    WINDSOR Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,257
    Likes Received:
    2,912
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I believe the consideration, initially of M/S, was based on
    a) no sign of forced entry,
    b) nothing obviously missing or stolen,
    c) no sign of struggle or mayhem,
    d) not that unusual for older people create M/S pact,
    e) bodies found together.

    Looking at the above scenario, it would not be unusual for a seasoned investigator to consider M/S as a possible or even likely.
     
  3. MistyWaters

    MistyWaters Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,807
    Likes Received:
    49,726
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don’t believe the motive was purely financial gain either.

    If in fact a beneficiary is the murderer, I’d imagine they’d support a m/s scenario, as opposed to a double murder and resulting investigation by LE, especially after going to the effort of staging the deaths that way. Estate disbursements take place regardless of the cause and manner of death. But the stigma of m/s is everlasting.
     
    Last edited: Apr 1, 2021
    Sphinx, al66pine, JoyMBee and 2 others like this.
  4. nuff

    nuff Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    483
    Likes Received:
    1,570
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Unless, of course, they hoped the m/s explanation would persist until they realized others close to them strongly opposed it, and conceded only to protect themselves.
     
  5. Bobbi Pearl

    Bobbi Pearl Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    162
    Likes Received:
    660
    Trophy Points:
    93
    I am still not convinced that TPS was not misquoted and never corrected the media, or they intentionally wanted an M/S dynamic floated to see what details stirred up. But if it was a ruse, that would be a quick assumption made by the detectives as M/S was brought up in the first few days ( not sure of the exact date or by who) either detectives have some very damaging evidence and know who they wanted to watch from the get-go or they just never corrected the narrative.

    TPS are not a bunch of stupid people, they are trained experts in specific fields of LE and they had a contentious relationship with the media around this time (The Chief often came off as defensive and uncooperative to media enquiries) , they were under a lot of pressure on many crimes in the GTA that had still not been solved. No TPS updates to the public on the possibility of a serial killer in Toronto, if we recall they said no the missing men were not related and no serial killer was on the loose in GTA. People have opinion that homicide was brought in to prove M/S they did this by checking the roof, checking sewers on the street, searching the entire home. Yes these searches could be used to rule out an intruder or they could have been following a lead they garnered from within. Either way, I doubt any detective would be offering any interviews, comments and or details to the media, they were still in observation mode.

    Historically, TPS (and other Regional Police Services) share very few details on any case, they always hold all cards close to the chest and act like they have a secret. We only find out if it hits the courts. Look at the horrific case of Christine Jessop, they finally named the culprit, he is dead but DNA confirmed it was him. Very few details about him or his crime have been updated or released since and they have closed the case. I know of 2 other cases where LE are 99.9% sure who the culprit is but do not have a body thus no DNA to use to prove it. One of those suspects is dead and the case file remains open.

    Bobbi Pearl
     
  6. Satchie

    Satchie Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    5,133
    Likes Received:
    24,462
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm not up on this stuff either but it seems to me any beneficiaries to BS get shares in Apotex Holdings, from which they get a portion of the generated income. I think that's the purpose of creating a shareholding company, you don't have to break up or sell the business. If one of the shareholders wants the capital, they sell their portion of the shares. There are also family trusts which allow family members to do various things without huge tax losses.

    Because if, as you described, BS had to sell off his 4 billion assets to give 1/2 to Honey, Mr. Taxman would get who knows how much: whatever the income tax rate is on $4 billion...
     
  7. MistyWaters

    MistyWaters Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,807
    Likes Received:
    49,726
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Perhaps but while we only read about it I can’t begin to imagine the act of hands-on strangulation, then moving and positioning both dead bodies into a satisfactory pose. That’s terribly gruesome, far more diabolical than a quick murder with the end goal of death occurring.

    I think by the positioning the killer was fulfilling a fantasy embedded deeply in their mind.
     
    Kittybunny, tayaway, nuff and 4 others like this.
  8. MistyWaters

    MistyWaters Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,807
    Likes Received:
    49,726
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes if so, I’d think definitely a stick or two of mental illness would be thrown in. Hatred too. Given an option of posing bodies, who in their right mind would wish for the final memories of close family members to become that of the husband murdering his wife, then taking his own life? It’s no picnic in the park for families to get beyond a suicide, let alone domestic violence/murder.

    The alternative of a staged home invasion, the sudden death at the hands of a violent thief robbing a home, does not tarnish the reputation of the innocent victims. It’s viewed as a tragedy.

    The intentional posing of the bodies in the way they were found was just as significant as the killing of the victims IMO.
     
    Last edited: Apr 1, 2021
    branmuffin, nuff, al66pine and 3 others like this.
  9. ThaiBali

    ThaiBali Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    273
    Likes Received:
    532
    Trophy Points:
    93
    I'm going for #2. I believe this was an inside job and that Honey was the main target hence her injuries which I believe were related to this Will.

    I see Honey being taken to the main bedroom to find the Will and this is where the belt was taken from. The house keeper noted the bed ruffled and it was not how Honey would make it.

    It was common knowledge that JS and Honey did not get along at all. JMO
     
  10. deugirtni

    deugirtni Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,281
    Likes Received:
    22,713
    Trophy Points:
    113
    RSBM

    On the very first day, the day the bodies were found, TPS went publicly on TV saying 'no outstanding suspects'. That suggests they already had in custody any suspects. This was reinforced a few times over the next days. I agree that TPS is certainly not stupid, and they had hoards of police working on this case. Plus the case was transferred to Homicide within hours. For whatever reason however, they may have wanted the public (and the killer(s)) to think TPS thought it was M/S for a full 6 weeks. There had to have been something super convincing at the scene that it was M/S, or they wanted the killer(s) to think the staging worked and that TPS thought M/S. moo.
     
  11. deugirtni

    deugirtni Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,281
    Likes Received:
    22,713
    Trophy Points:
    113
    RSBM
    Perhaps nobody in their 'right' mind, but perhaps someone who desperately wanted police to believe it was M/S might wish for that scenario, as opposed to an outright horrible murder that would then be fully investigated. It would've been so simple if police truly believed and went on to believe that there actually were 'no outstanding suspects'. That may have been what the killer(s) had been counting on. imo.
     
  12. Tobiano8th

    Tobiano8th Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    397
    Likes Received:
    955
    Trophy Points:
    93
    I saw reference to TStar Donovan article that lead homicide detective didn't go to crime site for first 4 days

    Assuming I interpreted headline (article behind pay wall) correctly, suggests TPS jumped to erroneous conclusion and not some genius swerve to trap murderer
     
  13. MistyWaters

    MistyWaters Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,807
    Likes Received:
    49,726
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No outstanding suspects typically means they’re not seeking anyone...as opposed to “police are seeking Joe Blow in regard to....”.
    How could TPS be seeking anyone, no way would they’ve known for sure it was a murder at first glance let alone whom to question.

    Regardless, I agree, either something other than the bodies led somebody at TPS to believe it was m/s - or because the deaths appeared that way, they just went with the flow and allowed the rumours to flourish until the full autopsies were conducted and medical evidence became known.

    But either way, the unnamed leak wasn’t an official TPS press release so we don’t know what TPS believed. Some officers may’ve saw it one way initially, others were of the opposite opinion. Regarding the recent Nova Scotia spree shootings, initial media reports from “police sources” were incorrect as well. The rush to be first out of the gate with breaking news is always how it goes.
     
    Last edited: Apr 1, 2021
  14. deugirtni

    deugirtni Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,281
    Likes Received:
    22,713
    Trophy Points:
    113
    From what others who saw the scene have said, they thought it looked like murder right away. And although they had no press release stating whatever an officer told reporters, since he/she said it off the record, we do know TPS went publicly on television to state 'there were no outstanding suspects'. I have never heard that said in a case where they're not sure yet whether it was murder. I have heard it said however, when there are two deaths in a home and they're quite certain one of the victims killed the other and then themselves. I think *that* is what started and allowed the rumours to flourish.... for whatever reason, whether they actually thought that, or they wanted someone to think they thought that.

    I think reporters report what they hear and see, etc. We are not present, but they are, and so they write about what's going on. I don't think any of them ever say they guarantee it's 100% accurate, and usually cases are changing as new information unfolds, etc. I think it is human nature for people to talk about a mysterious event, and also for people to want to hear about unusual occurrences, etc. Can't blame reporters for everything. imo.
     
  15. ldlager

    ldlager Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,581
    Likes Received:
    5,947
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I believe the shares of Apo were held in a trust, which could specifically protect against the “asset splitting” that you describe in a divorce, death, etc. Moo
     
  16. deugirtni

    deugirtni Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,281
    Likes Received:
    22,713
    Trophy Points:
    113
    True. But also just as hard to believe, is that TPS could actually be so incompetent in so many ways as has been laid out over the past 3.25 years. Gomes sent an underling (Price) to the scene, instead of going herself. The article is here too, hopefully you are able to access it here:

    PressReader.com - Your favorite newspapers and magazines.
     
  17. MistyWaters

    MistyWaters Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,807
    Likes Received:
    49,726
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How would Gomes have the ability to see into the future in order to know she was going to become lead detective? It’s impossible to state Gomes sent Price prior to her being appointed lead. Maybe Price was going to take charge and as the case grew in complexity Gomes was appointed lead? We just don’t know.

    Surely we’re not expecting the TPS to step up and explain themselves every time criticism driven by the media surfaces involving this case. Do people of Toronto really believe TPS is that incompetent or is it a case of believing one-sided biased media stories?
     
    Last edited: Apr 1, 2021
    Bobbi Pearl, dotr and al66pine like this.
  18. al66pine

    al66pine Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    7,218
    Likes Received:
    24,243
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ontario. Filing Will w Probate Court? Anyone?
    bbm @ldlager bbm That's what my post just preceding yours was asking about. My understanding is --- (at least in some US states), an atty/law firm holding the original will, learning of that client-testator's death, is obligated to file that will w the probate court Within a certain period, such as 30 days. I wondered if Ontario atty's are required to do the same.

    W a quickie search re Ontario, I did not find an answer and hoped one of our knowledgeable posters from the Great White North could ring in here.
     
    dotr and deugirtni like this.
  19. deugirtni

    deugirtni Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,281
    Likes Received:
    22,713
    Trophy Points:
    113
    From what I read, I understood that Gomes simply got the luck of the draw on the Sherman case, and already *was* the lead detective on the Sherman case - she didn't need to be psychic. Not so impossible to believe Gomes sent Price when TPS wrote it themelves, imo. My own thought is - too bad choices aren't made by TPS based on type or complexity of case.

    From article quoted above. PressReader.com - Your favorite newspapers and magazines. :

    "Each team typically has eight officers of different ranks, led by a detective sergeant. There is no favouritism or choice made depending on the type or complexity of case. The team that is “up” (available) gets the assignment. On that Friday afternoon, Det.-Sgt. Susan Gomes’ team was “up” and they were given the Sherman assignment. .... At no time that day did Det.-Sgt. Gomes, the lead homicide investigator, go to the crime scene while the bodies were there, Toronto Police have confirmed. [my note: the bodies left the scene the same evening of the day they were found.]

    Instead of going herself, Gomes delegated a junior homicide officer on her team, Det. Brandon Price, to attend. .... “Inspector Gomes had complete confidence in her partner (Price) to take on this task as they continued to work seamlessly together on the case,” according to a statement provided to the Star by Toronto Police spokesperson Meaghan Gray. Price gave a short press briefing that evening outside Old Colony Road, telling reporters there was no sign of forced entry and police were not looking for an “outstanding suspect.” ...

    “It was Detective Sergeant Brandon Price (Price’s rank was detective at the time, he has since been promoted) who was tasked by Inspector Gomes (who was also later promoted) with attending the Sherman home in the hours/days immediately following the discovery of the bodies...,” Gray said."
     
  20. deugirtni

    deugirtni Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,281
    Likes Received:
    22,713
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Also interesting is that it was Price, the underling who attended the scene instead of the lead detective on the case, who announced publicly on day#1 that there was 'no outstanding suspect(s)'. Meanwhile, according to Joe Warmington, Gomes said this at the time of the January 26, 2018 press conference:

    “I believe they (Shermans) were targeted,” said Gomes, who added it was never her view that it was a murder-suicide.

    WARMINGTON: Did cops mislead, bungle or capitulate in Sherman 'murder' probe? | Toronto Sun
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page



  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice