CANADA Canada - Barry, 75, & Honey Sherman, 70, found dead, Toronto, 15 Dec 2017 #19

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is waaaaay far out there but could someone at Apotex been stealing and selling valuable drugs (opiates) and Barry learned of this situation? :eek:

Opioid production is highly governed by Federal regulations and inspections. If there was a pill missing, it would soon be found out. I don't believe there has been any evidence suggesting that this was going on. Could the murderer have been a random, angry loved one of someone who died of opioid or other drug related use use? I donno. I just hope this case gets resolved soon.
 
This is waaaaay far out there but could someone at Apotex been stealing and selling valuable drugs (opiates) and Barry learned of this situation? :eek:

''The former CEO of Barry Sherman’s pharmaceutical company is fighting back against a sensational lawsuit launched by the world’s largest generic drug-maker—insisting he was never involved in a romantic relationship with a senior executive at rival Teva, and that he never persuaded the woman to illegally leak him lucrative trade secrets.

In a new court filing obtained by Maclean’s, Jeremy Desai responds for the first time to a high-profile U.S. lawsuit initiated last July—but thrust into the spotlight three months ago when Sherman, the billionaire founder of Apotex Inc., was discovered strangled beside his wife, Honey, at their Toronto home. The litigation triggered more headlines six weeks later, when Desai—Sherman’s choice to take over as president and CEO of his generic-drug giant—abruptly resigned “to pursue other opportunities.”

2018​

''Company: Apotex​

Key player: Mulazim Hussain

What Happened:
Hussain, a former employee of Canada's largest drug maker, stole a pile of pharma intellectual property, with alleged plans to set up his own lab in Pakistan.

Ironically, Apotex itself has been sued by the world's largest drug maker Teva for using drugs, sex and USB drives to steal its trade secrets.''
 
?

The Billionaire Murders: The Mysterious Deaths of Barry and ...

https://books.google.ca › books


Kevin Donovan · 2019 · ‎True Crime
The Mysterious Deaths of Barry and Honey Sherman Kevin Donovan ... There, she met a nurse named Cindy Ulster, and the two struck up a friendship.

The Dworkins sold the Forvert and other New York Yiddish dailies, and occasionally hosted visiting writers from these papers in their home. After her husband’s death, from about 1935 to 1955, she published a Canadian supplement to these American papers, inserting it for free into larger newspapers.

In the days before government medical coverage was available, she was one of the prime volunteers operating the Free Jewish Dispensary on Elizabeth Street, and was one of the first Jewish nurses and midwives practicing in Ontario. She served as the secretary of the Jewish Labor Committee in the mid-1930s and was active in the Canadian Jewish Congress, ORT and Pioneer Women.

She leaves behind her daughter Honey Arthurs; grandchildren Harry Arthurs, dean of Osgoode Law School, and Cindy Ulster, as well as five great-grandchildren.
-.-.-
bbm
 
Another possibility waaaaay out there - could one or both of the Sherman’s been dipping into the cookie jar, so to speak. We all know that opioids are strictly counted, but what about diet pills, anti-anxiety meds, sleeping meds, anything produced at Apotex. I’m not blaming the victims here, but could they have been blackmailed by someone who wants/needs a certain medication? They basically OWNED the cookie jar. That alone put them at risk.

Apotex had much info about creating drugs. Did someone try to get that info but the Sherman’s refused?
 
Last edited:

''The former CEO of Barry Sherman’s pharmaceutical company is fighting back against a sensational lawsuit launched by the world’s largest generic drug-maker—insisting he was never involved in a romantic relationship with a senior executive at rival Teva, and that he never persuaded the woman to illegally leak him lucrative trade secrets.

In a new court filing obtained by Maclean’s, Jeremy Desai responds for the first time to a high-profile U.S. lawsuit initiated last July—but thrust into the spotlight three months ago when Sherman, the billionaire founder of Apotex Inc., was discovered strangled beside his wife, Honey, at their Toronto home. The litigation triggered more headlines six weeks later, when Desai—Sherman’s choice to take over as president and CEO of his generic-drug giant—abruptly resigned “to pursue other opportunities.”

2018​

''Company: Apotex​

Key player: Mulazim Hussain

What Happened:
Hussain, a former employee of Canada's largest drug maker, stole a pile of pharma intellectual property, with alleged plans to set up his own lab in Pakistan.

Ironically, Apotex itself has been sued by the world's largest drug maker Teva for using drugs, sex and USB drives to steal its trade secrets.''
I just saw this now. Hmmmmm……..
 
Do we know which one was murdered first? Perhaps Honey was unseen by the killer until Barry arrived?
rbbm.
By Kevin DonovanChief Investigative Reporter
Wed., Dec. 12, 2018
''One of the intricacies of estate law is the “simultaneous death” situation, in which spouses die at roughly the same time (car and airplane accidents being the most common examples). In the Sherman case, both were last seen alive on the evening of Dec. 13, 2017: Honey left a meeting at Apotex headquarters with her husband and the architects of a planned Forest Hill home around 6:30 p.m., and Barry left his office at 8:30 p.m. One scenario under investigation by police, sources say, is that Honey arrived home shortly after 7 p.m. and was surprised by an attacker or attackers; the same happened to Barry when he arrived home later, around 9 p.m.''

''Sources have told the Star that Barry’s will left everything to Honey if he died first; if she predeceased him, it divided the estimated $5-billion estate and control of Apotex between their four children, aged 28 to 43.

In the hearing before Dunphy, Youdan said simply, “We do not know the order of death.” Due to the sealed file, the Star lacks the information to understand the relevance of this statement. However, death order is significant because, if Barry died first, his estate would flow to Honey, whose lack of a will could complicate how it is dealt with.


(In an email interview this week, Youdan said he was referring in court only “to the facts as known in the public sphere.” He said he was not revealing details about the order of death, the status of wills, or whether or not an individual had a will. He did not elaborate.)''
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
125
Guests online
2,539
Total visitors
2,664

Forum statistics

Threads
592,199
Messages
17,964,931
Members
228,713
Latest member
hannahdunnam
Back
Top