I think the fire kind of rules it out as a movie set. Its highly unlikely that a fire would start at that particular location, after the dungeon was found, unless it was set by someone. Whoever built the dungeon was afraid of what they would find during the investigation. Hopefully LE did all of the testing that they needed to in time! This is the 1st I've heard it was sound proof.
I am with you n/t - was wondering the same - why go public? why not just keep a close eye on the property and see who went there? Don't know if it would be possible to mount some tiny surveillance cameras, very well hidden inside or outside, or maybe even mounted on surrounding trees.
Or maybe I watch too many CSI shows
The 'materials used" statement made me think of 'sound-proofing' material !!
I think my imagination is running wild on this one.
Soundproof? and I thought my imagination was running wild when I thought of that !!
I do hope LE had the property under surveillance.
You're right Wanting2Help, no movie set, also nobody came forward.
Question:
Why was this house not under police surveillance? If it was being watched they would have caught whoever started the fire before it got out of control, and maybe even have spotted additional activity on other occasions. I read that the room was built relatively recently "Police said the house was last occupied in 2006, but the room was new believed to have been built within the last year or two." If I were them I would have had my eye on this place day and night.
Also judging from the pictures, this does not look like an amateur movie set to me.