Bumping for Sonia --
reminder from the 10-year ann article at
Investigators still working to crack Varaschin murder a decade later : Orangeville Citizen : https://citizen.on.ca that:
"He's [Det,Insp. S. Glassford] explaining the angle that the car was found, and how it might tell the direction her killer came to park the vehicle in plain sight. Did her killer come from Broadway, making multiple 3 point turns to park? Did they come from Third St. and make a wide turn to park or do they come down Dairy Lane and pull in like common sense, Glassford said, would suggest?
'Down here, where we are, is to me important. They obviously know that this little laneway's here and then you can park a car. To leave her car in an area that the public has access to, this car could have been sitting here for days you wouldn't notice it, whereas a car parked in the middle of nowhere is going to stand out to people,' said Glassford. 'Maybe there's been some thought there or maybe not, maybe they had to get the car back into town and from their takeoff, who knows.' ” (End of excerpt.)
I have always thought the perp (or perps), at least post-attack, was/were calculating their moves, that the "risks" were strategically mobilized. So I believe (contrary, I know, to others' equally viable views here) that the perp(s) parked their vehicle near the tack shop so that no passersby (maybe Sonia herself?) could recognize/identify it parked near her house, stealthily walked to the townhouse and likely entered without Sonia knowing or by some ruse (ex: need to use the phone) or by familiarity (she knew them in some way), then used her car to transport Sonia to the remote location and then back to their vehicle. The perp(s) was/were likely covered in blood; being in a car (Sonia's) at that point post-attack seems to me to offer more protection than less in terms of minimizing visibility and suspicion (contrary, for example, to their arrival). But why did they remove Sonia from her home???? Maybe to distance from the scene, as general theories go; maybe for opportunity to "return" to the crime later; maybe to degrade evidence; maybe to plant suspicion on her BF, since she was relocated closer to his residence; maybe, as some folks have said, for remorse and so the family wouldn't find her in her home or as an attempt to revive her; or... -?
I don't know if Sonia's murder was pre-meditated or not, and certainly the brutality of it all indicates this is the action of someone VERY dangerous; I'd agree the violence seems like madness. But actions before and after the crime all seem to me cold and calculated rather than as wildly impassioned as I think the crime itself..... So the identifier "young and reckless" as we've heard doesn't fully add up in my mind, although I know I may be wrong.
I guess the urgent questions remain: did anyone hear or see anything strange on that Sunday-Monday eve/morn that Sonia was murdered -? Was someone seen walking to her townhouse or (contrary to my theory) from the tack shop in the those hours? Was another vehicle seen near there in that time? Did anyone return home late, act strangely, clean their car and/or clothes on that Monday??
Ahhh, I know. We've been through this all before, including the debates over differing theories. It just feels like we remain in such a stall..... Glassford says the case is solvable, but that it can often take 20, 30 years. I sure hope we don't have to wait that long.....