Many posts have been made claiming opinions that CA is trying to reach out to the potential jury pool with her interviews. She made quite a few negative remarks about "bloggers" on LKL last Wednesday ~ does she think that jurors are not bloggers? Are those who blog about this case not allowed to be jurors? <snipped> "KING: You think all these people are saying well, if it were my daughter, I wouldn't stand by her? If it were my son... CINDY ANTHONY: I don't know. KING: ...I'd leave him? CINDY ANTHONY: I don't know if they are. If these people actually have children, you know -- I don't know what the -- who these bloggers are. I don't know. I get thousands of letters of people that are mothers and grandmothers that support me 100 percent. They're not bloggers. Bloggers, typically, are people that want to find fault with other things because that's what they do and that's how they spend their life. And it's kind of sad. If they would use that energy into something positive like we're trying to do, you know..."