Casey's sunglasses that police took

Discussion in 'Caylee Anthony 2 years old' started by AlwaysShocked, Dec 29, 2008.

  1. AlwaysShocked

    AlwaysShocked Active Member

    Messages:
    4,458
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I have an idea about the sunglasses the police took. LE is looking for a way to definitively tie Casey to Caylee's body. If she put duct tape onto Caylee's body and onto the plastic bags and she then touched her sunglasses - like you do when they are slipping down on your nose - she may have transferred some adhesive residue from the tape onto her sunglasses.

    Can anybody think of any other ways they can tie Casey to the body?
     
  2. Loading...


  3. Meemom

    Meemom Rest in Peace

    Messages:
    553
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Hmmmm....hadn't thought of that!
    Depending on just how thorough the botanist is, could be looking for a pollen of something from plants in the area, that could be trapped around the lens/frames. I get all all kinds of crude stuck there.
    Looking for any transfer of bodily fluids, decomp, etc that could have gotten transferred to those same little nooks and crannies around the lens and earpieces/screws.
    Could they have found a pair at the scene that are the same or very similar to the ones KC bought with AH's $ at Target? Thinking she replaced lost ones?
    Any more?
     
  4. Bobbisangel

    Bobbisangel New Member

    Messages:
    11,071
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I don't have a clue. Wouldn't any pollen or whatever from the woods also be found around George and Cindy's house as it is so close to where Caylee was found? It has to be something that can't be explained away by the defense as Casey was around Caylee and they all lived for the most part at the Anthonys. Bodily fluid wouldn't be able to be explained away for sure. Maybe a hair of Caylee's caught in the hinge of the glasses but one that was pulled out after Caylee was deceased. I just don't know.
     
  5. Pink Panther

    Pink Panther New Member

    Messages:
    10,701
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If they took them because they relate to the scene where the body was found, then I think that they may have found a piece of them - perhaps a screw or even a lense...

    I think it's most likely though, that they took them for other reasons. Perhaps not everything they took when they went back (with this third warrant) was necessarily related to the scene where the body was found. Perhaps they relate to something else entirely???

    MOO
     
  6. AlwaysShocked

    AlwaysShocked Active Member

    Messages:
    4,458
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Well at this point I would think LE has taken anything and everything that belonged to Casey out of that house - and it sure looked like they wanted to get in there and get the stuff before Cindy had a chance to move or get rid of anything.

    The wahing of the slacks by Cindy was a travesty. But LE did get a pair of boots that were in the car, as I remember. Perhaps there would be some body fluid on the boots.

    I think they have enough circumstantial evidence to convict Casey, but would just really like to see them come up with some strong forensic evidence so that the Anthony's don't have to wonder for the rest of their lives who did this to their granddaughter.
     
  7. TakeNote

    TakeNote Mother to little post it my boy wonder & Founding

    Messages:
    6,187
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Im thinking perhaps a receipt for a pair....or a tag....that she could have thrown in the bag when cleaning the trunk out...thinking it was just a peice of trash....

    maybe they found a pic with KC wearing them after Caylee went missing......humm
     
  8. Steely Dan

    Steely Dan Former Member

    Messages:
    30,559
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That's an interesting theory but if there is duct tape in the house it wouldn't be definitive proof of anything. She was using duct tape for whatever lie she has and touched her glasses. There must be some other forensic evidence they're looking for.

    Pollen in that area would still be airborne in KC's house or yard. However, a high concentration of a pollen or perhaps stuff like stickiness only found on trees that only grow in that area might have something to do with it.
     
  9. Trailerparkgirl

    Trailerparkgirl New Member

    Messages:
    198
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    but why would she leave her own sunglasses there? she can't be THAT dumb!?!?!
    i can understand caylee's sunglasses there, but why leave anything that belongs to her (kc) there????
     
  10. amyLynn

    amyLynn New Member

    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Some people have a habit of biting the end of the temples at the ear part.
    This could leave bite marks from their teeth. I don't think that is a reliable ID.
    I know it is a stretch, but just guessing!
     
  11. Forensic fan

    Forensic fan Member

    Messages:
    533
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Maybe she was wearing them on top of her head and they fell off & she didn't know it. This has happened to me, though not when I was disposing of a body!
     
  12. Forensic fan

    Forensic fan Member

    Messages:
    533
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Good catch, I hadn't thought of that, I bite mine too.
     
  13. forensicbuff5747

    forensicbuff5747 New Member

    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  14. TopGunner

    TopGunner Retired WS Staff

    Messages:
    4,915
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0

    I can't even find the bag.....:eek:
     
  15. forensicbuff5747

    forensicbuff5747 New Member

    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    it looks like a black bag, it could be a log... but if u look right under the blue tent, its right by the pole. sorry i know its hard to make out...
     
  16. TallCoolOne

    TallCoolOne Registered Lurker

    Messages:
    1,405
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Me neither. I looked and looked and looked, but still nadda.
     
  17. marla

    marla Former Member

    Messages:
    2,184
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Me neither ..
    I thought it was just me .. :seeya:
     
  18. sunsetbeach

    sunsetbeach Active Member

    Messages:
    2,256
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    I do see something just to the left of the front leg of the canopy. It does look like a white pair of sunglasses. I could see it with the naked eye but then blew it up and it really does look like white sunglasses. I wonder if she lost these and replaced them with the ones from Target?

    As always ... JMHO
     
  19. zoey

    zoey Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    17,141
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    48


    I can't either..but then again half the pics I can't tell what is what--I try but alas no luck....

    could the sunglasses also relate to uhmmmmmmmm the other case invoving stolen money????? She was pretty bold about wearing the "evidence"...she did purchase that pair of white sunglasses on stolen checks???? :waitasec::rolleyes:
     
  20. OpenMind4U

    OpenMind4U New Member

    Messages:
    733
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    IMO, the clue could be the SCRATCHES on the lens of the sunglasses. Remember, the area where Caylee was disposed is heavy wooded with a lot of branches...KC wares pretty cheap plastic lenses sunglasses. It's possible that they were scratched during disposal and under powerful microscope the expert can determine the rough scratch made by wood versa soft scratch made by everyday use....just MO...
     
  21. dreamerlin

    dreamerlin New Member

    Messages:
    366
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think they may be looking for chemical residue such as insecticide that could have been present on the inside of the bag and then perhaps on the sunglasses. This would also tie into LE confiscating all those sprayers in the second to the last search warrent.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice