Discussion in 'Located Persons Discussion' started by imstilla.grandma, Jan 28, 2020.
Made what comment?
exactly, there were lots of cctv cameras in that area.
How did he leave the truck without LE RD and whoever else saw the original seeing him alight?
i doubt they switched it off and just left it there after she left truck/4wd alone.
I agree it is not proof of anything. I posted a few pages back about my own cameras missing people getting out of the car at times when other times it shows them clearly! I misunderstood your question.
Another good question no one knows the answer to. Maybe out the back door?
Because that's not what happened.
I’ve never seen that happen in my decades following these cases.
We know SM had her cell phone with her in the vehicle (red truck) because she stated she used it to take a selfie photo with GS. Assuming she does not know how to edit image metadata (EXIF) LE may safely rely on the timestamp as being accurate.
I'm convinced either GPS (highly accurate) or more likely (given potential 'google' searches regarding cell phone and location) ping triangulation data (somewhat less accurate) is the reason LE has chosen to search in current areas. If it were GPS I'd expect they'd have located GS or evidence items by now. You can turn off "Location" on particular cell phones. But, some phones (Apple) retain location capability for certain applications even though you specifically turn off "Location" because the app requires it for one reason or another (that's a whole other story).
I can't image eyewitness tips as being the only reason for such thorough searching... but who knows.
No worries!! Out of curiosity, do you have a theory as to why this would be? Do you, for example, have any ignore restrictions set up on your system? Maybe people are exiting their cars and the system is "seeing" them as a boa constrictor or alligator or similar, thus ignoring them.
Other eyewitness accounts, GS/family history, other video of which we are not aware, sister testimony, etc.
This comment which is a statement.
A spokeswoman for the El Paso County Sheriff’s Department said investigators have a copy of the video and do not dispute Drayton’s description of what the footage purportedly shows.
Dated Feb. 5, 2020
Family of missing Colorado boy makes tearful plea after new surveillance video revealed
Oh, I thought she had shut it down. Thanks.
If my child wants to stay home from school, sick or not, I usually let him. He doesn't ask often and he's not struggling academically. He could play at a friend's in the afternoon if he wanted. I'm not sure how relevant that is here, though. It seems this situation was much darker than a kid staying home with a simple stomach ache. MOO
Gannon, you deserve better.
From the video there is no proof that someone exited on the passenger side, and if someone allegedly did...where's the proof of GS?
Some cameras/software are set to record either 24/7 or maybe for a specific length of time; we consider that as continuous recording regardless of what happens in front of the lens.
Then we have motion-sensing-triggered recording, wherein recording does not begin until something changes in front of the camera, such as a person or animal entering the image frame... this is a one reason why such recordings appear as having been 'edited', while in reality it was a result of the recording starting and stopping and starting and stopping, etc, based on motion (or other type of) triggering.
That you know of.
She started another one, it seems.
Not really. We can't discuss content from it here, but she's back on FB. She took down her FB, reinvented it with tributes to Gannon and put it back up. She also created a new FB page (closed group).
This sweet boy is safe, thankfully!