Right.
What's apparently being floated as a suggestion is the following:
- Ignore the fact that LE has told the public that there is nothing to indicate there's a threat to the community, and no signs of abduction.
- Ignore the fact that TS (mis)led LE into initially characterizing GS as a runaway.
- Ignore the fact that while we clearly see TS and GS departing their driveway in the neighbor's video, we only see TS get out of the truck.
- Ignore the fact that TS gave an interview in which she focused entirely on herself as the wronged party and made no pleas to any (non-existent) abductors to return GS to his family.
- Ignore the fact that TS crafted a statement that transparently bakes in excuses for GS's blood being found in the garage, the vehicle, and at the side of the house.
- Ignore the fact that the DA spent an hour at the house.
- Ignore the fact that LE has been searching an area 40 miles away for days.
Ignore all these
facts.
Focus instead on what may or may not be a shadow on the neighbor's video on the other side of the truck that afternoon.
Because what may or may not be a shadow on the neighbor's video that afternoon may or may not be a person.
And what may or may not be a shadow, may or may not be a person, who may or may not be Gannon.
Ignore facts.
Focus on a bunch of highly speculative, inconclusive and imaginative leaps, instead.
"Look over here."
NO. I ain't doing that.