Agreed.
She may be insensitive and a full blown pathological liar & narcissist (I’m not saying she is, just making a point) - and STILL BE 100% INNOCENT in his disappearance.
remember that weird “polyamorous” couple whose very little girl often ran the streets unsupervised. Everyone thought they did something terrible to her- it turned out it was the neighbor boy
Here’s the thing though, I felt something was wrong before this interview. I know many people here did as well:
That apparent Google search was unusual, and seemed like an effort to sell a false narrative.
Kids run away, but they rarely stay away. When they do, there is usually a pattern of behavior that precedes that.
The extended period of time in which Gannon was not independently seen alive before he went missing.
The apparent lack of video footage of him, and the posture of law enforcement that didn’t jibe with their words. This was a “runaway child” case, perhaps in name only. It sure as hell looked different from the genuine ones we have followed though, especially in regards to messaging (appeals and press conferences).
My biggest takeway from that interview is that law enforcement does not believe her; she said as much.
So while the interview on the whole was concerning, it’s the facts themselves that created the suspicion here.
All that other stuff certainly doesn’t help though.
There is of course the chance that this isn’t foul play, but if it is, the perpetrator is close to home.
