Auntie Cipation
Context Matters.
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2018
- Messages
- 3,431
- Reaction score
- 33,184
Your reasoning is fine, but you are making unfounded assumptions and/or conflating things that are not equal.I said the assumed date which has been said in the media and on posts. KB’s neighbor said PF’s truck was there all day on that day but didn’t consider it unusual. Also stated it was parked in such a manor as to block KB’s vehicles. Descriptive statement of the scene.
PF has two charges of first degree murder. One includes theft. Begs the question what did the DA think was stolen during the commission of this crime?
Hope that clarifies my reasoning. Very difficult case to understand.
First, the neighbor left her own home *sometime between 12:30 and 1pm* and as she did so, she observed PF's truck there. That is one moment of sighting, not a full half hour and definitely not an all day observation. If you've seen otherwise please provide the link so we can all see.
Second, there was no theft. Theft is not the same as robbery. And for that matter, while there was apparently a robbery, *there is no robbery charge*. What there is, is a charge of felony murder during the commission of a robbery. This charge has specific meanings that are different from a charge of murder, robbery, or theft. It has been discussed in detail earlier in these threads, with attorneys explaining the specifics. You can do a search for those conversations if you like.
We don't yet know what was stolen. It could be her phone and/or purse, as many believe, but they would have to be stolen or attempted to be stolen while KB was still alive, because the fear and threats she perceived are, as I understand it, what qualifies it for the felony murder charge.
Sorry if this seems nitpicky but these details matter, and the presumed "facts" will morph farther and farther from the truth if they aren't corrected when they first appear.