I think this was the best video (on this topic) that I've seen.
Just jumping off this post here. I had to take a couple day break from posting, for my own “mental health” (like many do here on occasion).
Several pages back, the last thread believe, someone posted the idea that NUA heard the cell phone ringing from inside the house. Remember, at that point, NUA either had a key OR the front door keypad code. When the front door child safety lock on the inside was engaged, she could only open the door a couple/few inches. So IMO. She calls SW cell again and hears it ringing. CW states “nothing to worry about”, blah blah) and then she calls the police. I guess not really a big deal here but 1) kudos to the original poster on that theory and 2) I’ve just been sitting on my hands.
This part is missing from NUA media interviews this week and I firmly believe it’s because she is a witness, and a crucial one at that. Personally, she shouldn’t have done interviews being a crucial key witness, but that’s just my opinion. And she did answer some questions for us. And maybe she needed to get a partial story out, stop getting hounded by media, etc. so I’m not judging her on that.
BUT I think the found cell location of SW is important. Why in the in between bedrooms areas and behind a couch? She can’t strangle anyone with a cell phone in her hand. So she wouldn’t have brought it to the girls’ room with that intent.
Some have also said she maybe peeked in on the girls at close to 2am. Very plausible. But me? My son would’ve hear his bedroom door and just seems to have a sixth sense about him even in is sleep LOL. I have thrown my back out trying to peek in on him and ninja or limbo style out of his room. We have always had the same brand/model as SW had. I’ve done by own testing but not going to share here as the lawyers should do their own testing. It’s VERY telling though.
Reason I had to take a break. A couple of days ago, while my son was in school, I went through this not only in my mind, but also physically walking through the scenario. Absolutely horrifying, but net result? ANY parent (Father or Mother) would first have to get the other parent OFF the child. Regardless if they threw them, grabbed something to knock them off, etc the result is the same. There is a step in between. Get parent off child, there is a very quick point there that do you then go after who hurt your child, or do you go in protection mode and try to save your child, children. Answer is clear.
Should you witness your child thrown off their bike by a hit and run driver.... do you rush to your child, or do you pass your child to run down the driver? You may look up briefly to try to catch a license plate (don’t think I’d have that in my mind no many how many cases I read on WS), but a Parents first and only initial response will be to save their child. Unless they are a psychopath.
exactly.