Apparently some inmate claims that Chris is saying he didn't kill his kids, but that's hardly surprising given how hated child killers are in prison and the death threats that he has received. And of course, Chris wants to be liked (or at least not hated) as well.
What I don't get is why would anyone would take anything seriously from any channel associated with the Watts that claims it is going to shed new light on something? Because aren't the Watts the only ones with access to him? And isn't Chris the only one who could shed any new light on anything? So why would the Watts keep going from channel to channel on YouTube?
And I do realize that you aren't supposed to be able to sue YouTube directly, but they do specifically say in their official hate policy that the 'victims of a major violent event and their kin' are protected. So isn't family annihilation a major violent event? They didn't specify 'mass shooting'.
They don't make the loved ones of school shooting victims have to sue every nutjob creator directly for defamation and bullying, as far as I know. Why should the Rzuceks or the Watts have to?
I think at the very least, every close family member of a victim of any violent crime should be able, with a single request, ask that any content considered sadistic bullying (making fun of the victim, saying they deserved it, etc) or defamation aimed at themselves and or their loved one (except for the perp) be removed and if it isn't, that channel should be banned. Because victims and their families are more vulnerable than anyone else to bullying, IMO>
The perpetrators families always get bullied the worst which of course the Watts are, but they are also victims of this family annihilation. So although, I don't agree with what they've done, I still feel compassion for them. I think most people would if they realized how painful all the bullying must still be for them.
I followed that inmate story, it's over a year old now but I see someone is just now repeating it. This guy is a nutcase IMO just repeated some things he heard online, and got himself on the 3 or so main victim bashing channels. He's been in and out of the slammer his adult life. I can't even repeat what has been going on with his own channel he started to reap some dough from his 15 minutes of fame, dark, horrible things.
YT isn't going to do anything but if you keep reporting the ones which attack victims/family of major crimes, then those channels don't show up in your own searches, the more a channel is reported they change YOUR algorithm but keep the channels online for YT and Channels own business models. If you report the channels with specific timestamps on the original video, that can be a different story, they can lose monetization.
The only way this will ever be fixed, IMO, is to change the law to make the channel owner legally responsible for things said in chat or comments. That was explained by an academic guy in the Frank Rzucek Sr. video taken in Shanann's house, begging the trolls to leave his family alone. There simply is no law at this time to hold the channel owners liable (for their own statements in their own videos, yes, but not for what they let occur in comment sections). The several main attack Rzucek channels simply put out bait, and say "what do you think, let me know in the comments", then it's WW3 against the victims, even the babies are verbally torn apart (their looks, their interactions with other kids, their IQs, their hair styles, their speech, their clothes, their sleeping habits, the shape of the girls faces, no kidding), and the channel owner gets a boost to their own algorithm from interactions on the comment section, and boosts from anyone who clicks up or down arrows. It's simply money in their pockets to respond.
One channel even put out one of Shanann's videos with Bella, and the channel owner slowed the audio down so it sounded like Shanann was growling horribly menacingly at her baby. That video is still up on that channel, which opened up the floodgates to bash the baby and mom.
I have partly gotten over this by likening those venues, in my own mind, to sewers. When I go to a big city I know under the manholes there is a sewage system with rats, albino cockroaches covering the walls, and all sorts of vermin, bacteria, viruses, mold, growth, disease, etc. But that doesn't mean I have to purposely look into that sewer.
Those channels that champion the parents of Watts to get them on to bash the Rzuceks, well I have scanned from time to time previously, there is nothing new, nothing at all new that they have turned up to exonerate CW or to implicate NK or any of the 10 other Coloradans the channel claims are part of the scheme. All of them apparently being more prone to baby killing than poor Mr. Chris "misunderstod" Watts, they argue. Not one single thing. Even the shadow image of so-called NK has been around since 2019, with no enhancement that discloses anything at all. The gait, the height of the 2 figures (seen only independently, never together) was analyzed in depth long ago. One figure is closer to the camera, one is further away, the heights are different, obviously because of the distortions of the neighbor's CCTV camera. Same with the supposed cell phone not showing up at Cervi until 9 am, or the one where they try to prove that CW didn't go up the steps at Cervi because his phone motion doesn't show steps. Everyone slightly acquainted with the case knows that Anadarko workers were not supposed to bring out their cell phones when near the tanks. And that is proven when TM points out that CW was always going back to his truck to use his phone.
Now, they are trying to implicate the water person, who worked for an entirely different company than Anadarko, they say the water person emptied the tanks, transferring oil from one tank to another, then opened the dozens of bolts on the bottom manway, and respectfully slid the girls' bodies into the industrial crude, thereby exonerating poor Chris from shoving the girls in the thief hatches as he confessed to having done, all by himself.
It's all a scam, bash the victims, propose conspiracies against the victims' family, and the cash pours in.
IMO
