Apologies not my intent at all - in researching this it’s clear the U.K. has very clear procedures for a missing person and guardianship but the US does not that I can find - and yet we keep going back and forth that incapacity is the same when you are missing and it isn’t that I and others have found based on the IN statues for probate - no harm intended at all
I was a realtor for less than ten years, buyers may have already postponed closing, probably this is mutual agreement to continue w/sale...we don’t know enough to criticize buyers, based on my statement. It gets complicated and can become row of dominoes. The buyers of Morphews’ property may have property w/ buyers for their property If one domino fails to fall the whole process halts. The transaction may have been intended to fund reward.JMO
That is what I said.
Why did this filing appear to go directly to the Indiana Supreme Court?
Here’s the thing - depending on the type of Guardianship filed the Letters have the power over whatever is in them - it could be just this singular property he has petitioned for permission to sell or it could be her bank and investments - we don’t know because that information is not public - but once Letters are issued he will have the power to do anything requested in his petition for guardianship- it’s one of the most powerful tools the court gives a person over someone else’s assets and their person IMO - I for one plan to watch the docket and see what’s next - that will tell us a lot IMO
It seems as though the scale BM is working at in CO that resulted in him in-filling a property for a manufactured home (note the piers on the photos) is not the kind of scale you'd need in order to maintain his current lifestyle.
It is entirely possible that Both parties wish to complete the transaction. Unless someone challenges this, I feel this may indicate Suzanne's family is still backing BM. IMO
You ,as buyer, could sue the seller under the purchase contract and the issue would be whether, under the terms of the contract or under applicable law, the fact that one of the selling parties has gone missing is an excuse for nonperformance. But here, of course (if indeed the house sale is the reason for the filing), BM wants the sale to go through. The buyer presumably doesn't want to sue. I think BM's attorneys may be pushing the envelope with the emergency guardianship law in an effort to complete the sale.
BBM Exactly. He must be relieved he doesn’t have to worry about coming up with the 100K reward. MOO
and is this the reason for BM claiming she was attacked by an animal from the beginning to legally label her incapacitated so he gain access to all things monetary and financial? IMO
Although I don’t disagree, why would one insist on the closing of any property related to the disappearance of a wife? Legalities aside, how bad would anyone want such property closed on asap although if you’re between homes without elsewhere to go I could see where that would be pressing. This case just becomes more convoluted every day with absolutely zero to go on. IMO
ITA further if I were SM’s family andI did not trust him, I would have him under a microscope. This is the stuff attys have to handle with caution, because it will be in the public record, etc.
