So, if one wanted to get a little more picayunish - maybe there wasn't any sign of a struggle, but there may have been signs of an "event" (or maybe a clean-up, after an event), but not necessarily signs of a struggle; in which case they'd still say no. Right? (Anybody know what I mean?) Also, can't LE simply flat-out lie, if they feel it's to protect the integrity of the investigation? That's an actual question - I know I've read that before, but not sure how accurate it is. MassGuy would know!