CATCH THE LATEST WEBSLEUTHS RADIO AS WE LOOK INTO THE TERRIFYING WORLD OF MEDICAL SERIAL KILLERS
CLICK HERE TO LISTEN

Crier on JonBenet case today

Discussion in 'JonBenet Ramsey' started by candy, Jan 7, 2004.

  1. candy

    candy Inactive

    Messages:
    324
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Catherine Crier will have a segment on the JonBenet Ramsey case today @ 5:00 pm on Court TV. It doesn't look promising w/ Poz and Larry Kobalinsky.
     
  2. K777angel

    K777angel New Member

    Messages:
    515
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ugh! Larry Pozner? I'd rather scrape my fingernails on the chalkboard than listen to that creep. He has to be the UN-happiest man alive. So full of anger.
     
  3. Imon128

    Imon128 Former Member

    Messages:
    2,064
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Right, Poz the Schnozz...big ugh. I will watch, though, because of interest in the case. Poz is so predictable, amongst his other unsavory characteristics. :rolleyes:
     
  4. Ivy

    Ivy Inactive

    Messages:
    2,199
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I have never seen Pozner when he's not throwing a tantrum. I agree...UGH.
     
  5. candy

    candy Inactive

    Messages:
    324
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well, just like I thought, it was an entirely one sided pro-Ramsey show. How Catherine Crier has folded and capitulated is just awful. There wasn't ANYONE representing "the other side" because all you have to do to the likes of Crier is say "lawsuit", and they fold.

    They talked also with the author of a People Magazine article on the piece, the author from Atlanta, which tells you all you need to know about that article.

    Also, note to Fox News, this People magazine writer also said the Ramseys moved to Charlevoix last summer.
     
  6. Imon128

    Imon128 Former Member

    Messages:
    2,064
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Very one sided and not entirely factual. Not to mention it looks like Edward Scissor Hands got to Poz's hair, or else let Poz use them. Waste of air space, but I'm glad I tuned it in just to see what's the Lin's spin.
     
  7. Britt

    Britt New Member

    Messages:
    1,911
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    lol... Yeah, I always enjoy seeing the Poz. :crazy: Kinda miss the roadkill 'do, and he appears to be experimenting with gel... mousse, maybe...

    Never thought of him as angry, though. I thought he was going more for drama... y'know like, what he lacks in substance he tries to make up for in presentation.
     
  8. Ivy

    Ivy Inactive

    Messages:
    2,199
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Pozner...what a star he are. har.
     
  9. Barbara

    Barbara New Member

    Messages:
    741
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Make no mistake:

    Catherine Crier has said on more than one occasion that the parents should not be removed from that infamous "umbrella". CTV has, I'm sure told her to be careful with her comments, but make no mistake, she believes the family is involved in the murder.

    She has said it as her personal opinion only.
     
  10. Ivy

    Ivy Inactive

    Messages:
    2,199
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Since the networks, including CTV, are apparently too chicken to contradict Wood and the Ramseys, why do they have them on? Why must the networks give the RST an uncontested forum from which to spread their lies and IDI propoganda? Why don't the networks just say NO?
     
  11. Barbara

    Barbara New Member

    Messages:
    741
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    $$$$$$$$$$$ :razz:
     
  12. Ivy

    Ivy Inactive

    Messages:
    2,199
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh...I thought networks paid their guests, not the other way around.

    I s'pose that soon Wood will have his own show.
     
  13. Barbara

    Barbara New Member

    Messages:
    741
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, it's not that. It is the fact that the mere mention of JBR brings viewers, in turn brings sponsors, and HENCE $$$$$

    It doesn't matter to most whether what is being said is true or not, just that they have viewers. Viewers equal more money.
     
  14. Ivy

    Ivy Inactive

    Messages:
    2,199
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Thanks, Barbara, I gotcha now. What a travesty.
     

Share This Page



  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice