Darlie Routier asks for DNA testing

[cami]

the problem for Darlie though is there were no wet towels, none on the boys, none anywhere except some damp ones in the spa and the laundry room. NO bloody wet towel with Devon's DNA, no bloody wet towel with Damon's DNA. Darlie used a dry towel or dish cloth on her own neck though so she knew how to stem her own blood flow but not her boys? Sheesh. Yeah that's some help screaming hold on Damon over the phone. The "wet towel" evidence only surfaced once she realized her kitchen sink had been taken for testing.

 

[cami]

It's State's exhibit 67 if anyone familiar with the transcripts knows which knife that is.

Yes State's exhibit 67 is the murder weapon.

Link to the order:

http://courtecom.dallascounty.org/pav/PublicAccessProvider.ashx?action=ViewDocument

 

[PassTheMotrin]

As we all know Txsvicki, the boot print in blood behind the couch was matched to the paramedic who treated Devon, his name was Koschak I believe. It's quite clear from the trial transcripts.

Koschak is now fire captain at Station 3. He's also a deputy with the Wichita County Sheriff's Department. (Just an interesting FYI since it's been 18 years now).

 

[Louie14]

Her supporters don't believe her enough to come out of pocket with the funding for this last round of DNA testing. None of the tests so far have been in her favor. Trust me, if it had Darlie Kee, King, Moff, Steph and the other darlieites would be shouting it from the rooftops.

I think I saw a thread from 2013 claiming that DNA testing came back on her favor .
I found the thread : http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?229317-DNA-results-are-in

 

[Crow_Ascending]

No DNA test has come back in Darlie's favor. A judge ruled that Darlie would be allowed further testing on some items due to new DNA procedures. And the beat goes on.........

 

[Louie14]

Actually it was my son's dog's name and it was spelled Kami. I changed it to the C when I chose it as a username

Lol , Louie is my cat's name .

 

[Louie14]

Hi 2sisters:

He came to sexually assault the lucious Darlie....he could see her lying there on the couch through the sliding glass doors...according to Chris Brown that is. But he doesn't jimmy that door and enter that way and abduct her....he makes it so difficult...he slits a screen and crawls through a window into a dark, overcrowded garage. Yep luck was on his side as he left not a trace of himself around or on that window or in the garage or anywhere in the Routier home. Yes very fortunate 2sisters...

Hahahahaha................

 

[cami]

No DNA test has come back in Darlie's favor. A judge ruled that Darlie would be allowed further testing on some items due to new DNA procedures. And the beat goes on.........

The latest DNA results are now back in--June 2015. There is nothing and I mean nothing that gives Darlie relief.

As we know, they were conducted Quantifilier Duo (Y-STR) tests on some of the evidence. This is isolating Male DNA by isolating the male chromozone Y.

As we also know, her supporters have been claiming the two blood stains on the shirt with a mixture is unknown third party DNA.

There are only 2 samples that include male DNA. One of them is 10-2589.5D3 (cutting of stain from lower back of shirt). It is a mixed profile. The major component is Darlie. The minor component is a partial profile and Darin is not excluded as a possible contributor.

The other sample with possible male DNA is 10-2589-5D5 (also cutting from back of shirt): Darlie is the major component. The minor component is male but is not suitable for testing. Too incomplete.

The rest of the DNA samples are female and almost definitely came from Darlie.


No male DNA found in the bloody sofa back table print.

The results are posted at http://www.dallascounty.org/public_access.php

Choose "accept" then you have to enter Darlie's case number which is F9639973

 

[Zzzz]

Thanks Cami. No surprises of course. But Darin was never bleeding was he? How could he not be excluded as a partial contributor?

 

[cami]

Thanks Cami. No surprises of course. But Darin was never bleeding was he? How could he not be excluded as a partial contributor?

No Darin was never bleeding. this post is from Val on the DNA

The DNA report specifies for each sample as to what kind of chance there is that DNA belongs to someone else.

For example - Darlie cannot be excluded from 10-2589.2 but that doesn't mean it's her DNA to the exclusion of all people who ever lived. The frequency of occurrence of these DNA markers at those positions is 1 in 2.5 sextillion Caucasions, 1 in 39 sextillion African Americans, and 1 in 21 sextillion Hispanics. Meaning 1 out of every 2.5 sextillion Caucasions will also have these markers. It is pretty safe to say it's hers of course and that's why the report states that it's a "reasonable degree of scientific certainty" that it is. But it's not accurate to say it IS hers, if you know what I mean.

The sample that cannot exclude Darin is similar but not nearly as conclusive.

The markers at several of the loci in this sample are incomplete. A complete profile would have 2 alleles at each of all 13 loci. (There are other things on the chart besides loci which is why there is more than 13 columns). Some of these loci have 1 allele, some have 2 alleles, some have 0 identified alleles, and some have more than 2 alleles (which means it is a mixture or inconclusive).

The chances of this sample (10-2589.5D3) belonging to anyone but Darin or his paternal relatives (which includes Devon & Damon since they are patrilineally related) are "not expected to exceed 0.06% in a random sample group of Caucasians, African Americans, and Hispanics." That means that the chances of these particular DNA markers belonging to anyone besides Darin or his paternal relatives are about 6 hundredths of one percent of people. In other words, 6 one-hundredths of one percent of Caucasian, African American, or Hispanic males also have these same markers.

This sample result is not as conclusive as the samples attributed to Darlie because they are not as complete. Not strong enough for a "scientific degree of certainty" disclaimer - but pretty unlikely it belongs to an unknown male.

It would be a real reach for her defense to claim it's not Darin, Devon, or Damon's DNA, but it's also not absolute that it is.

 

[JezMyOpinion]

Wonder how her fanbots are going to disprove DNA? Those who did the testing were against Darlie? They didn't do all of the tests? The cops send tainted items to test? It seems very quiet on her fanbots pages... But isn't that exactly what we expected from them?

 

[cami]

Wonder how her fanbots are going to disprove DNA? Those who did the testing were against Darlie? They didn't do all of the tests? The cops send tainted items to test? It seems very quiet on her fanbots pages... But isn't that exactly what we expected from them?

They are speculating now that Darlie was so much in shock and only got a tiny glimpse of the intruder, that it was a woman, LOL. Disregarding Darlie's own statements and testimony that it was a man she followed to the utility room door. Other than that, it's been pretty quiet on her fan pages. They've already thrown Darin under the bus as much as they can.

You can see from the DNA tables on the evidence tested, there was very little contamination if any so they won't get away with that. But i'm sure the conspiracy theories will soon kick in as you noted.

 

[Madeleine74]

You know your case has totally jumped the shark when all that's left is conspiracy and more conspiracy to explain why the perp was convicted. The truth hurts, and it hurts so much that fans and supporters of a killer (just about any killer, actually) will twist themselves into an illogical pretzel to avoid ever having to concede the sad reality of a case. Sometimes a cigar is really just a cigar. And yes, sometimes even mothers commit despicable and atrocious first-degree murders on their children. Sociopathy and psychopathy doesn't leap past a person just because they've procreated. Many evil killers have married and borne children long before they ever became a killer.

 

[Madeleine74]

So what's left now? Allegedly the DNA testing was the last hurdle to jump before the State of TX could/would set a date for execution.

Anyone think the State of TX really doesn't want to execute D.R. and will allow further delays to avoid this one death row inmate?

 

[cami]

So what's left now? Allegedly the DNA testing was the last hurdle to jump before the State of TX could/would set a date for execution.

Anyone think the State of TX really doesn't want to execute D.R. and will allow further delays to avoid this one death row inmate?

LOL, not in this lifetime. This will most likely end her state appeals and she will move into her federal appeals, but I am not absolutely positive that will happen. We will have to wait and see what transpires next.

 

[Madeleine74]

Federal appeals...

So, she could have another 5 years, maybe even 10?

 

[neesaki]

The latest DNA results are now back in--June 2015. There is nothing and I mean nothing that gives Darlie relief.

As we know, they were conducted Quantifilier Duo (Y-STR) tests on some of the evidence. This is isolating Male DNA by isolating the male chromozone Y.

As we also know, her supporters have been claiming the two blood stains on the shirt with a mixture is unknown third party DNA.

There are only 2 samples that include male DNA. One of them is 10-2589.5D3 (cutting of stain from lower back of shirt). It is a mixed profile. The major component is Darlie. The minor component is a partial profile and Darin is not excluded as a possible contributor.

The other sample with possible male DNA is 10-2589-5D5 (also cutting from back of shirt): Darlie is the major component. The minor component is male but is not suitable for testing. Too incomplete.

The rest of the DNA samples are female and almost definitely came from Darlie.


No male DNA found in the bloody sofa back table print.

The results are posted at http://www.dallascounty.org/public_access.php

Choose "accept" then you have to enter Darlie's case number which is F9639973

I don't get it. When I go to the link, it brings up the list. And the most recent shown is this:

4/6/2015 order-miscellaneous addt'l DNA testing F9639973.

Click on that and it brings up the actual court order. But there are no later entries after 4/6/2015 that show the results of the testing. Cami, anyone, how are you seeing the results ? Were they removed ? :waitasec:

 

[cami]

I don't get it. When I go to the link, it brings up the list. And the most recent shown is this:

4/6/2015 order-miscellaneous addt'l DNA testing F9639973.

Click on that and it brings up the actual court order. But there are no later entries after 4/6/2015 that show the results of the testing. Cami, anyone, how are you seeing the results ? Were they removed ? :waitasec:

I just checked and yes it has been removed!!!!! The order was dated 17/06/2015

 

[neesaki]

I just checked and yes it has been removed!!!!! The order was dated 17/06/2015

How weird is that ? :ufo:

 

[blefuscu]

Can they order her to move on now? Or does she just get to keep on stalling? Can she try to order more DNA tests or does she have to find another angle to appeal from?