DC - Savvas Savopoulos, family & Veralicia Figueroa murdered; Daron Wint Arrested #3

Discussion in 'Crimes in the News' started by wfgodot, May 15, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. rkf

    rkf Inactive

    Messages:
    2,309
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This is not from last night.
     
  2. jjenny

    jjenny Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    27,456
    Likes Received:
    9,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why would he take the photo at all?
     
  3. KristinSchmistin

    KristinSchmistin *Awesome* User

    Messages:
    809
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ahhhhh thank you for putting that together with me. I just sat there reading the docs over and over trying to piece it together.... that makes sense. And that's how they caught W1 in the lie about the money details.

    FYI, I couldn't find the link to the interview tapper had with lanier- but I think the "two people/money dropoff" thing was possibly not specifically stated in the interview, but stated in the court documents that more than one person was involved- in the handling of the $$- sorry to confuse anyone!!

    Also, here's a link to the news story where it talks about more than one person being involved (also on court docs- saying "wint and others" on the first page)
    http://www.wusa9.com/story/news/loc...urder-daron-wint-charging-documents/27788809/

    Court docs link: http://www.scribd.com/doc/266278174/Daron-Dylon-Wint-Charging-Documents

    Hope that helps! :)
     
  4. popsicle

    popsicle faith hope love

    Messages:
    22,101
    Likes Received:
    134
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Most criminals are stupid? I think he was bragging to his friend.
     
  5. SpanishInquisition

    SpanishInquisition Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,521
    Likes Received:
    1,969
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why would the driver text the person that gave him the money rather than someone who was at the house? The driver reported to SS and it was SS that directed him to do this in the first place rather than the exec or the accountant, so texting them wouldn't accomplish anything as the driver is responsible to SS for delivering the money to home per his orders, not to the exec or the accountant.
     
  6. rkf

    rkf Inactive

    Messages:
    2,309
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why would SS trust this idiot with $40K? Assuming he is not involved, he is not someone I would call when my family's lives depended on getting something done.
     
  7. Advocate1

    Advocate1 ~Advocate 4 Justice~

    Messages:
    376
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This is what I was pointing out.
    I believe the "Assistant/driver" is Mr. Wint's relative.

    Also Im confused about Stephen Wint. Has anyone verified if this is just an alias or if Wint really does have a brother named Stephen Wint??
    Another thought I had is if they are brothers could they be twins and share the same DNA??? Sorry my mind works all angles at the same time sometimes.
     
  8. Just K

    Just K New Member

    Messages:
    6,320
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm beginning to think those vests were either worn by a phony lawn care crew or they were worn as the group pretended to be working near the home.
     
  9. stmarysmead

    stmarysmead Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,100
    Likes Received:
    1,400
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There's no Steffan Wint as a Facebook friend. If you look at his list of "family" there is one male. Different name.
     
  10. i.b.nora

    i.b.nora I am polka dot

    Messages:
    8,887
    Likes Received:
    359
    Trophy Points:
    83
    OMG! I think you are right!

    W1 is the driver/assistant, he sent a photo of some money to W2.
    w2 received a photo of some money sent by W1.
    And, the "other employee" is the one who got the money from the bank.

    Yes???

    Man, it would be so much easier if they would just say what they mean instead of trying to disguise gender. Thankfully, no one seems to be transgender, otherwise IT might be construed as a slur of some kind.
     
  11. Wysteria

    Wysteria Member

    Messages:
    586
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Tension breaking humor.
    If we did not have a few posts like this here and there, I think we'd all go nuts.
    Or nuttier than we already are.
    xxxooo
     
  12. GigiG

    GigiG New Member

    Messages:
    2,567
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    BBM:

    So it sounds like there were TWO red cars? And one of them is missing?
     
  13. Joe Friday

    Joe Friday Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,429
    Likes Received:
    1,851
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Since Wint was a former employee of American Iron Works, it would surprise me if other employees (current or former) are involved in the kidnapping/ransom attempt also.

     
  14. Advocate1

    Advocate1 ~Advocate 4 Justice~

    Messages:
    376
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
     
  15. jjenny

    jjenny Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    27,456
    Likes Received:
    9,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sounds to me like more bad reporting. If there were a red car missing, I think police would have been looking for it, showing its photo, etc.
     
  16. citygirl

    citygirl Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,624
    Likes Received:
    18,153
    Trophy Points:
    113
    My head is spinning with all the conflicting info. Time to sit back, take a breath, and wait. As always, hate when that happens
     
  17. GigiG

    GigiG New Member

    Messages:
    2,567
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    And Chief Lanier cautioned during the press conference that "there is a lot of misinformation out there."
     
  18. Voice4theSilent

    Voice4theSilent Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,076
    Likes Received:
    757
    Trophy Points:
    113
    To me it sounds like there are 3 red cars (though I am doubting the report that one is missing.) There were 2 cars in the driveway (blocking the garage) in the photos of the area taped off by LE (one was the Range Rover and one was the red convertible Audi.) The red car that the money was placed in was found in the garage because it was mentioned in the Affidavit that it was searched. If there is another red car missing that would be a 3rd red car and someone would have had to have moved the cars around to leave the two cars blocking the garage when LE showed up.
     
  19. Madeleine74

    Madeleine74 Of course it's my opinion, who else's would it be?

    Messages:
    10,732
    Likes Received:
    5,669
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This is often the case with media reports. And then people will turn themselves into pretzels trying to connect it together when the media reports are more like the end result of 10 people playing "telephone," the game where person #1 whispers something into person #2's ear and the last person in the line has to say what they were told. :rolleyes:

    The basic facts are what we know are valid:

    4 people were murdered inside a house that was then set on fire

    1 person previously employed at company owned/run by husband was for sure arrested and charged and traveling with other people who were taken in at the same time.

    Police believe others are involved in the crime

    The exchange of the cash probably involved more than 1 person. Those persons may or may not somehow be involved, but that isn't being said right now.

    Pizza was delivered to the house. Main suspects DNA was found on discarded pizza crust.


    everything else... speculation (aka rumor).
     
  20. jjenny

    jjenny Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    27,456
    Likes Received:
    9,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I re-read the affidavit. Apparently, W2 is not the "other employee" with the authority, but some unknown person who got the photo.
    So, W1 is presumably the assistant who went into the bank with "other employee." "Other employee" withdrew the money and gave the money to W1 to deliver. W1 send a photo of the money to W2 (some unknown person).
    No reason was given in the affidavit why W1 send photo to W2.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page



  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice