For awhile now JB has been spouting his closely-held secret "full story" of what really happened and how we will all be applauding KC as mother of the year when this "full story" is disclosed in court. I just read the defense's witness list and the only witnesses listed are three forensic scientists hired by the defense. In other words, no percipient witnesses are listed. (A percipient witness is a witness who saw, heard or otherwise observed something, an event or someone. For example, Tony and Amy are percipient witnesses to KC's actions and words during the relevant time period.) So how is JB intending on disclosing the true "full story" at trial if not through witnesses? Here are the only ways this can happen, if it happens at all: 1. KC testifies to the true "full story" which apparently involves no other witnesses to the event or events; 2. The computer forensics and physical forensics tell the true full story without the need for percipient witnesses; 3. Through cross-examination of the State's witnesses with possible corroboration via forensics. I don't think number one is likely because even JB has to know that the prosecution will have a field day if KC takes the stand. I don't think number 2 is likely either because the forensics (released so far) don't tell us the cause of death. So we are left with option number 3--but I can't imagine how they could take the information known to date and twist it into a story that would implicate anyone or any other cause other than murder by KC. What am I missing here?