Discussion in 'Travis Alexander Trial - The State vs. Jodi Arias' started by LambChop, Mar 14, 2015.
If that's what you feel is best.....
This ought to be interesting.
Did Sherry talk to the deputy?
But, remember, It's not her fault. :laughcry:
Jennifer P, the bailiff, reported a few things she overheard/observed from Janet - Juan should be stabbed, told 1st jury foreman verdict should be 2nd degree, Janet cried when verdict of guilty was read. Those are very serious allegations, imo, and Jennifer took a big risk with her job coming forward. I'd like to hear more from the 1st jury on why they feel the way they do about Janet.
Maybe it will be interesting. Honest and direct answers to questions could make it so. So, maybe not.
So sad that I have a hangnail that I will need to take care of during that time slot...
I hope someone will post the video on youtube or here. I live in NC and will not be able to view it here.
I wish we could hear more from the 1st trial jurors on why they didn't like Janet. If Janet really did say all of those things and cried over the verdict, then at the very least she should not have been JSS assistant during this sentencing retrial. Do we know if she was?
I'm sure her lawyer has already told her how to respond. I think her answers will be well rehearsed.
I don't think she will clear anything up. I think her attorney probably advised her to make conditions about what they can and cannot ask, and her answers are probably already prepared and rehearsed in advance.
Ha! Great minds.
Hey guys I'm seeking the video where Judge Stephens voir dire's the group that 17 is in and there is "I see no show of hands". Does anyone have it at their fingerprints? Thanks!
I have to laugh I wrote "fingerprints" as I meant fingertips. lol
I'm currently working on a project that involved taking my own fingerprints (nothing legal lol). That's funny! :lol:
Couldn't agree more - wouldn't it be considered jury tampering no matter who said it to the foreperson?
Katie Wick could give you an earful. She's also been a beezy (to use PASA's word) to the Alexanders and victim family trial watchers.
In my observations Janet is a Pit Bull and since Judge Stephens, is, well not that I can see why she would want her around (JSS I mean and no I do not think that is ok I just can see it).
Yes. He seemed to like, or at least respect her until the MDLR racial slur accusation. In one of his FB re-trial postings he claims she was less than cordial to him, cane lady, and Mikal Ann after that incident.
Idk if this has been answered but KN did say that Jennifer accompanied them to an in chambers meeting about this. He did not elaborate on whether she was questioned personally but seemed to recall the events the same way Juan did. It's worth mentioning that JSS was the one who brought this up again. It seems she wanted to get it on record that her assistant denied the allegations.
Sent from my SCH-S960L using Tapatalk 2
LOL ... We're are the same page.
Wow, I don't even know how to grasp what she's (Janet) doing in a courtroom then! How hasn't she been removed, fired, reassigned, something???