I am not sure, but it looks like Joan recalculated some of the matches which seemed high but are actually lower because they had only very small segments of the DNA in commonI wonder if a lot of these new matches were from CrimeCon
I am not sure, but it looks like Joan recalculated some of the matches which seemed high but are actually lower because they had only very small segments of the DNA in commonI wonder if a lot of these new matches were from CrimeCon
Would @DNA_Sleuth be able to look and check?I am not sure, but it looks like Joan recalculated some of the matches which seemed high but are actually lower because they had only very small segments of the DNA in common
It was apparently ParabonWas it announced that the DDP assisted with the identification of Gerron Gipson? Cant find it anywhere.
Could go either way. I think the language points in the direction of an update, there's a relative of the Jane Doe in the clip but this could be like Apache Junction Jane Doe's uncle.Is she identified or are they just giving an update?
Could go either way. I think the language points in the direction of an update, there's a relative of the Jane Doe in the clip but this could be like Apache Junction Jane Doe's uncle.
Sounds like it! There are two cases which despite of similar difficulties were solved (Dana Dodd aka Lavanda Doe and Kelly aka El Dorado Jane Doe),in both cases despite finding close relatives from the fathers side, it did not solve the case (unknown paternity). Unfortunately in case of Apache Junction it is even more complicated, as the father was adopted. I wonder if Mowry Jane Doe has a similar storyRight—the reference to ‘twists and turns’ sounds to me as though it’s one of those cases where finding a close relative doesn’t solve the whole family tree.
But I hope I’m wrong!
MOO