See, I don't find anything circumstancial about
1) The trunk smelling of human decomposition. The air samples prove that there was a decompositional event that took place in Casey's trunk. The canine dogs prove this and the human nose has proven this numerous times. The stain, if the jury is able to make out Caylee's outline, proves this. What proves that this was not only human decomposition, but that the human that was decomposing in the trunk of Casey's car, was Caylee Marie Anthony, is the hair with the post mortem death banding.
2) There is nothing circumstancial, imo, that everything found at the scene where Caylee was eventually found ties back directly to the Anthony home. Duct tape. Garbage bags. Laundry Bag. The Winnie the Pooh blanket. The heart shaped sticker. NOW that we are going to say that there is no ZFG.. means that ZFG never had a key to the Anthony home.
3) The searches for chloroform when high levels of chloroform was detected in the trunk of Casey's car.
4) Casey texting about the smell of death in her car... that should be added to #1 on my list, but what was she thinking???
5) Telling LE that Caylee had actually called her that day 911 was finally called to report Caylee missing. The day Casey wanted one more day because 31 days was not quite enough for her.
6) The 31 days of partying... sleeping with Tony... getting a tattoo.... there is just too much there that proves she could care less about the death of Caylee.
I could go on and on and on... even if this is circumstancial evidence.. it all comes full circle... Casey sure likes circling people's names.. she should be circling her own... with a bullseye!
1) Circumstantial, all based on shaky science that isnt accepted by the mainstream in the field. FBI even admits they cant prove the hair that was found indicates decomp or certain. Reasonable doubt can be shown.
2) Highly circumstantial. Doesnt prove Casey was the murderer, the things found could implicate anyone in the Anthony home or access to the home, again, reasonable doubt could be shown.
3) Circumstantial, mother Cindy also works with Chloroform and has done searches for such. Plenty of reasonable doubt here.
4) Doesnt look good for Casey but can easily be explained away by DT in any number of ways to seed reasonable doubt.
5) Lying to LEO isnt a good idea but it doesnt prove murder. It doesnt make her look very good and coupled with other evidence these types of lies may eventually be her undoing but a good defense attorney can seed reasonable doubt even here.
6) True but it doesnt mean she killed her and that is all that matters.
As far as I am concerned, just based on all the facts I know as of today (and I do not know them all so my opinion could change), but as of now, what I do know would not allow me, in good conscience, to vote for a conviction for first degree murder. Lesser charges possibly, but I would have to see the choices first.
Casey did a lot of VERY STUPID things and there is a chance that she did murder the child, but that doesnt matter in our system of justice, all that matter is,
CAN THE STATE PROVE IT...I am not certain they can.
I have gotten a countless number of acquittals in cases where the state had far more evidence than this. The only reason a guilty verdict may happen is because of all the pre trial publicity, which, IMO, is a shameful way to get a convicition, like CA or not, under our system of jurisprudence she deserves a fair and impartial trial by jurors not tainted by the likes of Nancy Grace et al.
My prediction: Hung jury.