Okay, if JBR was garroted to death, then the paintbrush used to violate her was used before killing her or when she was already dead from the blow to the head.Therefore, this was more of a "necrophilia" case, than a pedophilia case. Therefore, her garroting couldn't have been used in erotic asphyxiation because she wasn't being raped while she was being strangled. That's why I think she was already dead from the blow to her head and that's how the parents found her. To cover it up, they used the paintbrush to violate her and then made the garrote out of the paintbrush and rope. Or vice-versa: she was strangled already and had a blow to the head. All in all, I think it was a cover-up. And, this is why the Rams were so quick to say it was a pedophile. I guess I just don't buy the EA theory because the paintbrush couldn't be up her vagina and being used to garrote her at the same time and there is no evidence that anything else was inside of her. Am I making sense?? In other words, how could the paintbrush be used for two different purposes at the same time? Blue Crab, do you have a theory on this??