Drew Peterson's Trial *FIFTH WEEK* part one

Status
Not open for further replies.

katydid23

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2011
Messages
64,614
Reaction score
202,189
I wish I could see if the 'cocky' arrogant DT is going to act all cool now that they failed miserably on their first day of presenting their defense. I bet Drew ain't smiling right now either... :dance::dance::dance:
 

Jackson44

New Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
643
Reaction score
0
In Session The sidebar ends. Judge Burmila: “We’ll be in recess until tomorrow morning.”
 

katydid23

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2011
Messages
64,614
Reaction score
202,189
On cross, and upon being shown a report, Devine's memory is refreshed & he says Anderson did, in fact, mention the knife under the mattress.



OMG. Could it get any more embarrassing for the D-Team?
 

LaLaw2000

Louisiana
Joined
Jul 7, 2008
Messages
12,501
Reaction score
1,638
On cross, and upon being shown a report, Devine's memory is refreshed & he says Anderson did, in fact, mention the knife under the mattress.



OMG. Could it get any more embarrassing for the D-Team?

I hope so!
 

Jackson44

New Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
643
Reaction score
0
On cross, and upon being shown a report, Devine's memory is refreshed & he says Anderson did, in fact, mention the knife under the mattress.



OMG. Could it get any more embarrassing for the D-Team?

I just saw this in the tweets. It wasn't on the InSession part. What a surprise!
 

katydid23

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2011
Messages
64,614
Reaction score
202,189
I don't get TruTV, but if anyone sees the DT being interviewed, please share what they say. I really want to see how they try and spin this disastrous performance of theirs...lol
 

lonetraveler

Crime Addict
Joined
Jul 8, 2008
Messages
16,795
Reaction score
37,836
In Session The sidebar ends. Judge Burmila: “We’ll be in recess until tomorrow morning.”

I think that the attorneys should get rollerskates and just roll right up to the judge's bench, it would make it quicker. :floorlaugh:
 

Jackson44

New Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
643
Reaction score
0
Found this:
In Session After a long pause, prosecutor Connor begins his cross. “Miss Anderson didn’t mention anything about a knife under her mattress? Is there anything that might reflect your recollection?” “Yeah . . . it’s been four years.” The witness is shown a copy of his report, which he reads silently to himself. “”When you took that report, what did she tell you about observing a knife?” “That she did keep a knife under the mattress.” “And by ‘she’ you mean Kathleen Savio?” “Yes.” That ends the cross-examination; there is no redirect, and so the witness is excused.
 

katydid23

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2011
Messages
64,614
Reaction score
202,189
I just saw this in the tweets. It wasn't on the InSession part. What a surprise!

Can you believe that. they call this 'witness' in order to make one point, and a kind of superfluous point at that. And then he is impeached anyway.

I wonder if they are going to be strutting around in matching suits and big sunglasses this afternoon? I hope so. :floorlaugh:
 

lonetraveler

Crime Addict
Joined
Jul 8, 2008
Messages
16,795
Reaction score
37,836
On cross, and upon being shown a report, Devine's memory is refreshed & he says Anderson did, in fact, mention the knife under the mattress.



OMG. Could it get any more embarrassing for the D-Team?

And to think that it takes at least three defense attorneys to come up with this defense................LOL :floorlaugh:
 

LaLaw2000

Louisiana
Joined
Jul 7, 2008
Messages
12,501
Reaction score
1,638
I don't get TruTV, but if anyone sees the DT being interviewed, please share what they say. I really want to see how they try and spin this disastrous performance of theirs...lol

Insession will not be back on until 8am Central time in the morning.
 

SoBeCzar

New Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2012
Messages
888
Reaction score
21
I am soooo happy for todays testimony. Witnesses actually backfired on the defense! This is going Great!
 

katydid23

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2011
Messages
64,614
Reaction score
202,189
GodseyG: I really hope they call Tom and admit the letter he wrote to Michael Sneed in 01....


Does anyone know what that refers to?
 

wishinuall

New Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Messages
147
Reaction score
0
Thanks to the defense because now the case is making much more sense to me...DP behavior smells of mid life crisis from what i have read about the subject...with Savio out of the picture, the money, the kids, everything was his...Stacy knew what happened and he wouldn't let her at any of that money...again, my opinion on a possible scenario...I may have missed the reason though to why did DP give his son 3 guns and the money...could the guns have been murder weapons? I'm still trying to make sense out of all this...may Kathy and Stacy get justice and peace

In Session The judge asks to have the jurors removed from the courtroom. Once they’re gone, he asks the State is it’s filing a motion in limine regarding a conversation between Harry Smith and Stacy Peterson. Prosecutor Griffin says that she doesn’t have that motion written up, but that she’s prepared to argue it orally. “It’s my understanding the defense is seeking to call Harry Smith regarding a telephone conversation in which Stacy asked Mr. Smith if she could get more money out of Drew if she threatened to tell the police he killed Kathleen Savio . . . that still leaves the question of the cases that we cited earlier . . . this doesn’t go to impeachment of the statements that she made to Rev. Schori. It doesn’t even say that she was going to extort money, just that she asked about it . . . this does not directly impeach what Harry Smith said that she told him . . . it’s intrinsic evidence that would not be allowed for impeachment . . . and, again, she cannot be rehabilitated except by her coming in and telling what she meant by any of these statement . . . there are specific rules for impeachment in Illinois; this simply does not fall under one of them . . . I believe there’s no rule in Illinois that would allow for the impeachment of Stacy’s statements to Neil Schori with this intrinsic evidence.”
Hellllllllp Me!!!! Why, oh why would this be a bad thing???? OMG! It seems as tho the DT & PT flipped sides today...and WHO is the judge on the bench & what did he do with Burmilla?!
 

LEFT-COASTER

Not to worry, I got the squirrels cornered
Joined
Nov 14, 2008
Messages
701
Reaction score
0
what an interesting day this has been.. lol

I would love to know how DP is feeling about now .. hahaha
 

LaLaw2000

Louisiana
Joined
Jul 7, 2008
Messages
12,501
Reaction score
1,638
Can you believe that. they call this 'witness' in order to make one point, and a kind of superfluous point at that. And then he is impeached anyway.

I wonder if they are going to be strutting around in matching suits and big sunglasses this afternoon? I hope so. :floorlaugh:

Ha! They may be in sunglasses this afternoon in an attempt to be incognito out of embarrassment! Think it will work?
 

lonetraveler

Crime Addict
Joined
Jul 8, 2008
Messages
16,795
Reaction score
37,836
I wish I could see if the 'cocky' arrogant DT is going to act all cool now that they failed miserably on their first day of presenting their defense. I bet Drew ain't smiling right now either... :dance::dance::dance:

I don't know katydid23, I think that Drew Peterson would grin if he was in front of a firing squad, his arrogance is that bad.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top