Elizabeth Johnson's Court Hearings & Charges

Discussion in 'Gabriel Johnson' started by debloree, Jan 26, 2010.

  1. debloree

    debloree New Member

    Messages:
    1,419
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Elizabeth's arrest and court hearings.
     
  2. Loading...


  3. debloree

    debloree New Member

    Messages:
    1,419
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    http://www.kpho.com/news/22107312/detail.html

    Tempe Baby Missing After Mom's Arrest
    Elizabeth Johnson Failed To Appear In Family Court

    POSTED: 6:54 pm MST January 1, 2010
    UPDATED: 3:24 am MST January 2, 2010

    TEMPE, Ariz. -- A Tempe woman has been arrested in Florida on suspicion of custodial interference but police say the whereabouts of her infant son remain unknown.

    Elizabeth Johnson, 23, was taken into custody Wednesday by Miami Beach police, authorities said. They said Johnson was in San Antonio, Texas, from Dec. 22 to 27.

    Johnson was scheduled to appear in Maricopa County Superior Court's Family Court in Phoenix for a Dec. 28 custodial hearing. But authorities say she failed to appear and lost custodial rights to 8-month-old Gabriel Johnson.

    Authorities said Elizabeth Johnson has yet to reveal the wherebouts of her baby and they also are searching for the car she was driving.
     
  4. BeanE

    BeanE Inactive

    Messages:
    19,137
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
  5. BeanE

    BeanE Inactive

    Messages:
    19,137
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Does Elizabeth have a court hearing tomorrow?

    TIA
     
  6. TXHOPE

    TXHOPE New Member

    Messages:
    684
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I thought her next one was in March.
     
  7. BeanE

    BeanE Inactive

    Messages:
    19,137
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Okay. I saw a couple posts elsewhere saying something about her having a hearing tomorrow, or her and Tammi having a hearing tomorrow. I thought hers was March too.

    Thanks, Txhope
     
  8. b4e

    b4e Bubba's Mommy

    Messages:
    1,144
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  9. BeanE

    BeanE Inactive

    Messages:
    19,137
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
  10. BeanE

    BeanE Inactive

    Messages:
    19,137
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.g...rtCases/caseInfo.asp?caseNumber=CR2010-101760

    Party Information
    Party Name - Number Relationship Sex Attorney Judge Case #
    State Of Arizona - (1)
    Plaintiff N/A County Attorney, Maricopa
    Elizabeth Joanne Johnson - (2)
    Defendant F Public Defender-, S E Master Calendar CR2010-101760-001
    Tammi Peters Smith - (3)
    Defendant F To Be Determined Benny CR2010-101760-002

    Case Documents
    Filing Date Description Docket Date Filing Party
    2/10/2010 NSI - Notice of Supervening Indictment - Party (002) 2/11/2010 Plaintiff (1)
    2/10/2010 606 - ME: GJ Not/Supervening Indictment - Party (002) 2/11/2010
    2/10/2010 IND - Indictment - Party (002) 2/11/2010 Plaintiff (1)
    2/5/2010 IAD - Initial Appearance Document - Party (002) 2/5/2010
    2/3/2010 DCO - Direct Complaint - Party (002) 2/3/2010
    1/26/2010 152 - ME: Not Guilty Plea Arraign - Party (001) 1/26/2010
    1/21/2010 002 - ME: Hearing Vacated - Party (001) 1/21/2010
    1/14/2010 IAD - Initial Appearance Document - Party (001) 1/14/2010
    1/14/2010 NSI - Notice of Supervening Indictment - Party (001) 1/15/2010 Plaintiff (1)
    1/14/2010 606 - ME: GJ Not/Supervening Indictment - Party (001) 1/15/2010
    1/14/2010 IND - Indictment - Party (001) 1/15/2010 Plaintiff (1)
    1/12/2010 DCO - Direct Complaint - Party (001) 1/13/2010


    Case Calendar
    Date Time Event
    1/15/2010 8:35 Status Conference
    1/20/2010 8:30 Preliminary Hearing
    1/25/2010 8:30 Original Arraignment Hearing
    2/8/2010 8:35 Status Conference
    2/12/2010 8:30 Preliminary Hearing
    3/9/2010 8:15 Initial Pretrial Conference
     
  11. BeanE

    BeanE Inactive

    Messages:
    19,137
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Can anyone interpret that info in above post? Is that another GJ indictment just in the past couple days? Was the previous GJ indictment for all three charges or were any of them not brought by the GJ? Could this be a new charge?

    Going to dig to confirm what the GJ already indicted on.

    ETA: never mind. Just realized that's Tammi GJ indictment. The parties (001 and 002) tell you whether the item is for Elizabeth or Tammi.
     
  12. BeanE

    BeanE Inactive

    Messages:
    19,137
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    They are scheduled to appear for separate hearings in Maricopa County Superior Court on Tuesday

    Snip

    Johnson’s attorney, Vanessa Smith, who works for the Maricopa County Public Defender’s Office, has filed a motion with the court to ban any media coverage of the court proceedings, arguing that it would infringe on Johnson’s right to a fair trial and jeopardize her safety.

    Repeated requests for interviews with Smith and her lawyer in recent weeks were declined. Requests for jailhouse interviews with Johnson also were denied.


    snip

    In the ongoing investigation, authorities have compiled 1,575 pages of discovery and 52 CDs of recorded interviews, according to Maricopa County Superior Court documents.

    snip

    Johnson has been charged with kidnapping, child abuse, custodial interference and conspiracy to commit custodial interference. She is being held in a Maricopa County jail on a $1.1 million cash bond.

    http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/151556
     
  13. BeanE

    BeanE Inactive

    Messages:
    19,137
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Party Information
    State Of Arizona - (1) Plaintiff N/A Andrews, Angela
    Elizabeth Joanne Johnson - (2) Defendant F Smith, Vanessa Master Calendar CR2010-101760-001
    Tammi Peters Smith - (3) Defendant F KIMERER, MICHAEL Master Calendar CR2010-101760-002

    Case Documents
    Note that party 001 is the State, party 002 is Elizabeth, and party 003 is Tammi

    Filing Date Description Docket Date Filing Party

    3/4/2010 094 - ME: Oral Argument Set - Party (001) 3/4/2010

    3/1/2010 BON - Bond - Party (002) 3/2/2010 NOTE: PAPER/SURETY $15,000 SENECA INSURANCE COMPANY

    3/1/2010 RTR - Return Receipt For Official Court Files/Transcripts/Exhibits - Party (001) 3/3/2010

    2/25/2010 REQ - Request - Party (001) 3/1/2010 NOTE: FOR TEMPORARY REMOVAL OF OFFICIAL COURT FILES, TRANSCRIPTS OR EXHIBITS

    2/25/2010 OFT - Order for Temporary Removal of Court File/Transcripts/Exhibits - Party (001) 3/1/2010

    2/25/2010 RRF - Release Receipt For Official Court Files/Transcripts/Exhibits - Party (001) 3/1/2010

    2/25/2010 152 - ME: Not Guilty Plea Arraign - Party (002) 2/25/2010

    2/25/2010 MOT - Motion - Party (001) 2/25/2010 NOTE: FOR COMPLEX CASE DESIGNATION

    2/25/2010 NOT - Notice - Party (001) 2/25/2010 NOTE: OF REQUEST FOR VICTIM INTERVIEW

    2/24/2010 RAD - Request For Automatic Additional Disclosure - Party (001)

    2/24/2010 NDR - Notice of Defenses and Request for Notice of Rebuttal Witnesses - Party (001)

    2/24/2010 RGJ – Request for Extension of Time to Challenge Grand Jury Proceedings - Party (001)

    2/24/2010 MOT - Motion - Party (001) 2/24/2010 NOTE: FOR CONTEMPORANEOUS RECORDATION OF ARGUMENT ON MOTIONS AND OBJECTIONS TO PRESERVE DEFENDANT’S RIGHTS ON APPEAL

    2/24/2010 REQ - Request - Party (001) 2/24/2010 NOTE: DISCOVERY / JAIL TAPES

    2/24/2010 OBJ - Objection/Opposition. - Party (001)

    2/24/2010 NOTE: TO MEDIA COVERAGE

    2/23/2010 RTM - Returned Mail - Party (002) 2/23/2010

    2/18/2010 002 - ME: Hearing Vacated - Party (002) 2/18/2010

    2/10/2010 NSI - Notice of Supervening Indictment - Party (002)

    2/11/2010 Plaintiff (1)

    2/10/2010 606 - ME: GJ Not/Supervening Indictment - Party (002)

    2/11/2010

    2/10/2010 IND - Indictment - Party (002) 2/11/2010 Plaintiff (1)

    2/5/2010 IAD - Initial Appearance Document - Party (002) 2/5/2010

    2/4/2010 ROB – Release Order Secured Appearance Bond - Party (001)

    2/8/2010 NOTE: $1,000,000

    2/3/2010 DCO - Direct Complaint - Party (002) 2/3/2010

    1/26/2010 152 - ME: Not Guilty Plea Arraign - Party (001) 1/26/2010

    1/21/2010 002 - ME: Hearing Vacated - Party (001) 1/21/2010

    1/14/2010 IAD - Initial Appearance Document - Party (001) 1/14/2010

    1/14/2010 NSI - Notice of Supervening Indictment - Party (001)

    1/15/2010 Plaintiff (1)

    1/14/2010 606 - ME: GJ Not/Supervening Indictment - Party (001)

    1/15/2010

    1/14/2010 IND - Indictment - Party (001) 1/15/2010 Plaintiff (1)

    1/12/2010 DCO - Direct Complaint - Party (001)
     
  14. BeanE

    BeanE Inactive

    Messages:
    19,137
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
  15. BeanE

    BeanE Inactive

    Messages:
    19,137
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
  16. BeanE

    BeanE Inactive

    Messages:
    19,137
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
  17. BeanE

    BeanE Inactive

    Messages:
    19,137
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
  18. TXHOPE

    TXHOPE New Member

    Messages:
    684
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  19. BeanE

    BeanE Inactive

    Messages:
    19,137
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That would be a good question for the Legal Questions thread. I don't know if they have to have something to match it to before they can ask for it, or if they can request it "just in case".

    I'm thinking they might have found something at the landfill they questioned and needed DNA to check against and that might form the justification for the request. But I don't know the fine points of the law on the orders for DNA tests.
     
  20. mitzi

    mitzi Watch us lie to cover for 'Princess'

    Messages:
    4,339
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Could it be for DNA testing on the ring?...another poster on the ring thread questioned if LE had tested the ring for DNA to see who else may have handled or worn it.
     
  21. BeanE

    BeanE Inactive

    Messages:
    19,137
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The initial oral argument is this morning at 9:30am in Maricopa County court. The judge is Judge Ryan.

    To find out what time the hearing will be in your time zone, check this website. I already have it set for 9:30am in AZ, so just look for a city in your time zone to see what time it will be for you:
    http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/f...hour=9&min=30&sec=0&p1=197&continent=namerica

    That's a very handy website to bookmark because not only can you find times in different time zones, you can also find things like what the weather was on a certain date and time in a certain city, what time sunrise or sunset was, etc. Very handy for working on cases, as well as checking what time hearings and pressers are in your own time zone.

    You can go to this website to look up information about Elizabeth's case. Just click any of the three links, put in Elizabeth's name or the case number, and the information will come up:
    http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/CriminalCourtCases/index.asp

    Make sure you have the right Elizabeth Johnson - there's more than one. Elizabeth Joanne Johnson - DOB: 7/24/1986.

    BeanE
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice