Estate of Rebecca Zahau et al v. Shacknai et al

Discussion in 'Rebecca Zahau Nalepa' started by *Lash*, Jul 13, 2013.

  1. *Lash*

    *Lash* Justice 4 Rebecca

    Messages:
    3,000
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Estate of Rebecca Zahau et al v. Shacknai et al

    http://dockets.justia.com/docket/california/casdce/3:2013cv01624/419200/


    Plaintiffs: Estate of Rebecca Zahau , Estate of Robert Zahau , Mary Zahau-Leohner and Pari Z. Zahau

    Defendants: Adam Shacknai, Dina Shacknai, Nina Romano and Does 1 through 50, inclusive

    Case Number: 3:2013cv01624
    Filed: July 12, 2013

    Court: California Southern District Court
    Office: San Diego Office
    County: San Diego
    Presiding Judge: Thomas J. Whelan
    Referring Judge: Nita L. Stormes

    Nature of Suit: Torts - Injury - Other Personal Injury
    Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
    Jurisdiction: Diversity
    Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff


    image.jpg

    THANK YOU, Quester!!!
     
  2. Loading...


  3. *Lash*

    *Lash* Justice 4 Rebecca

    Messages:
    3,000
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I cannot help myself! Justice for Rebecca!

    :balloons: :thewave: :balloons:​
     
  4. bourne

    bourne "The truth shall set you free." ~JUSTICE FOR REBEC

    Messages:
    2,405
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    FINALLY! THANK GOD THERE IS A GOD! WOOHOO!!!!

    Justice for Rebecca Zahau and her family :)
     
  5. Mrs. Holmes

    Mrs. Holmes New Member

    Messages:
    683
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I am STUNNED JS is not part of this. This could be a huge mistake. I sure hope they know what they are doing. Very worried.
     
  6. Mrs. Holmes

    Mrs. Holmes New Member

    Messages:
    683
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I wonder what 1-50 Inclusive is? I took a list I believe these are financial holdings....and must belong to JS?
     
  7. Mrs. Holmes

    Mrs. Holmes New Member

    Messages:
    683
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Apparently this actually means they can add other names if other information comes to light... Thanks InParadise!
     
  8. MissJ

    MissJ New Member

    Messages:
    2,844
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Happy dance! About time! MOO
     
  9. Betty P

    Betty P Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,737
    Likes Received:
    2,254
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Does anyone have access to the PACER system to view full details of the case?
     
  10. Mrs. Holmes

    Mrs. Holmes New Member

    Messages:
    683
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This is going to be fascinating. DS and AS are odd characters. I wonder if they know yet as even the media has not got ahold of it just yet and it takes time to serve the papers.
     
  11. Mrs. Holmes

    Mrs. Holmes New Member

    Messages:
    683
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This is going to be fascinating. DS and AS are odd characters. I wonder if they know yet as even the media has not got ahold of it just yet and it takes time to serve the papers.
     
  12. time

    time New Member

    Messages:
    9,379
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    WOW! I am so happy! Thank you Quester and Lash for finding this :rockon:
     
  13. time

    time New Member

    Messages:
    9,379
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It looks like it is a 9 page complaint, 3 page declaration by Declaration of Pari Z. Zahau, Civil Cover Sheet, and a 2 page Summons Issued.

    Again, thank you Quester!
     
  14. Gilgamesh

    Gilgamesh New Member

    Messages:
    362
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Glory glory hallelujah!!!!!
     
  15. time

    time New Member

    Messages:
    9,379
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I hope this works, see attachments

    3:13-cv-01624-W-NLS
    Estate of Rebecca Zahau et al v. Shacknai et al
    Thomas J. Whelan, presiding
    Nita L. Stormes, referral
    Date filed: 07/12/2013
    Date of last filing: 07/12/2013

    Case Summary

    Office: San Diego Filed: 07/12/2013 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Demand: $9999000 Nature of Suit: 360 Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
     

    Attached Files:

  16. Carioca

    Carioca Member

    Messages:
    493
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
  17. AZlawyer

    AZlawyer Verified Attorney

    Messages:
    7,778
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Interesting. Looks to me like they still have no idea what happened--it's a very vague complaint. I assume they hope to figure it all out during discovery (document demands, depositions, etc.).
     
  18. time

    time New Member

    Messages:
    9,379
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Thank you AZ, I was just going to ask you to come here and comment. If the filing is in, can more be added as information becomes available via the other lawsuit. Does this possibly buy them some time to add to their case since the basic complaint was filed in time....I guess it could be moot if it is heard because of the timeline?
     
  19. Gilgamesh

    Gilgamesh New Member

    Messages:
    362
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What other lawsuit?
     
  20. time

    time New Member

    Messages:
    9,379
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  21. time

    time New Member

    Messages:
    9,379
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice