Family Sues Over Virgin Advertisement....

Discussion in 'Up to the Minute' started by Samiya, Sep 23, 2007.

  1. Samiya

    Samiya Jason, you're pathetic

    Messages:
    1,003
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22456861-662,00.html

    snippet..

    eptember 21, 2007 12:14pm VIRGIN Mobile Australia has been slapped with a lawsuit after it ran an ad featuring a picture of a US teenager with the slogan "Free virgin to virgin".
    American teenager Alison Chang, and her church-going family, had suffered “grief and humiliation” from the advertisements, according to the lawsuit filed yesterday in a Dallas court.

    Virgin Mobile also printed one of its campaign slogans, "Dump your pen friend,'' over the girl's picture.

    The family said in the lawsuit the company had invaded the girl's privacy by using the picture, which they claim was taken from the Yahoo-owned photo-sharing website Flickr.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Sami
     
  2. Loading...


  3. Samiya

    Samiya Jason, you're pathetic

    Messages:
    1,003
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Maybe I should've put this in the Strange section??

    Sami
     
  4. Amraann

    Amraann Former Member

    Messages:
    9,705
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think the bigger issue is that her youth counselor posted her picture online.
    The terms of that site simply say that they must credit the photographer.

    So big companies don't even have to pay models.
    That is pretty lousy since they used her picture for a large ad campaign.
     
  5. Taximom

    Taximom Former Member

    Messages:
    16,234
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
  6. Taximom

    Taximom Former Member

    Messages:
    16,234
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    From her brother 3 days ago:
    teacherjamesdotcom says:

    Hi, we've obviously been keeping up with the news and with these boards. I'm not going to post often because I shouldn't. But I do want to put up some responses to a few of the previous posts.

    Some might think that we are suing for money. I just want to bring up these points.

    1. Virgin Mobile and the ad company did something wrong here. They took ordinary people's photographs, put them up in an ad campaign, and didn't notify anyone. I've posted before about what possible thinking went through the heads of the ad company and managers when someone MUST HAVE asked, "...shouldn't we notify these photographers that we're using their picture?" And someone at their companies said No, and had a justification for it.

    In our opinion, that is wrong. Before bringing on legal representation, I had sent them a complaint letter, asking them to explain the situation. Before filing suit, our attorneys sent them complaint letters to explain why they acted as they did. And everytime back, their "corporate" response was: We did nothing wrong. We acted in the faith of the CC License. We are on the side of creativity (even the ad company started a new thread on FLICKr saying they are just creative, etc.).

    In my opinion and our opinion, this is not adequate by any means. It's a big company, sidestepping normal procedure (like notifying people) to save money. Justin didn't actively seek out Virgin to sell his photos, just like 100 of the other user images they pulled, didn't actively seek out Virgin, or any commercial entity.

    2. If they are genuiely HONEST about trying to promote creativity among photographers, ad campaigns, etc. Why wouldn't they contact the photographers then? The CC License 2.0 stipulates that you need to attribute the photographer and location of the photograph. Just putting someone's Flickr page on the bottom left hand corner doesn't attribute the photographer's name OR the location of the photograph. If they really wanted to help photographers and spread the word, putting "image by CHEWYWONG on FLICKr" doesn't really give a lot of exposure to Justin or his photography "talents", does it?

    They made a clear decision to bypass notifying photographers (even though CC 2.0 talks about correct attribution) and of course they didn't contact anyone within the images.

    3. She's a minor. And she's a girl. And her image was FOUND in Australia. By a complete stranger, who just happened to see it at a bus stop. Wouldn't that make you feel uncomfortable?

    She didn't consent to this. Yeah, it's possible my sister might have been excited to be part of a Virgin Mobile campaign. And no doubt it can be seen as 15 minutes of fame by some. But, the point is, she wouldn't have said okay to this image of her, portrayed in this way. I guarantee you my mom would have never said okay to Alison's picture being put on a billboard in Australia. There's no point for us. Alison's not an aspiring actress, she's not an aspiring model. Why in the world would we want to expose a 15 year old high school student halfway across the world to sell phones for Virgin Mobile?

    And now, imagine that one day someone shows you an image of her halfway around the world, selling phones for Virgin Mobile, with that goofy picture. With all the stuff being written about predators online and stories, wouldn't that make you a little uncomfortable? It definitely made my mom uncomfortable. And as her brother, it makes me angry. What stops another company or Virgin to do this again? Pull pictures elsewhere. For another ad. It's just not right. And Virgin's response is...NOTHING. Nothing stops us from doing this again. Nothing stops another company from doing it. Because nothing is wrong with what we did. In fact, we are promoting creativity. We are helping Justin and my sister, and other photographers.



    I disagree. My mom disagrees.

    And so, we filed suit. And for me and mom, we are glad that this story is gaining exposure. People need to know about the Creative Commons attribute and EXACTLY how to use it. Hopefully, it gives people some pause when they think about all the pictures out there on the internet and all the people that just posted pictures to share with friends and family.
    Posted 3 days ago. ( permalink )
     
  7. TheShadow

    TheShadow New Member

    Messages:
    1,568
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I agree with the brother that this is bull. Taking people's photos and using them without a release to advertise and make money off of them. I know that I was furious when I found a photo of me, taken by an ex-boyfriend, on the internet. It was clothed, but an unflattering picture taken without my knowledge. This a$$-hole posted this pic on his webpage with a lengthy commentary about my personality and the reasons for our break-up. Uuuuuhhh....hello...I'm 40 years old, not in junior high. What's up with this immature cr*p?? I was really ticked off, mainly about the picture being out there where anyone could see it and send links to other people, etc. I really told him off and threatened to rat him out to the people he worked for because he was stupid enough to use their domain name for his little revenge page. I can't believe Virgin thinks this is a good idea to advertise using images without consent. :banghead:
     
  8. deanws

    deanws Former Member

    Messages:
    11,210
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    They are probably embarrassed because she looks so goofy in the picture! :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
     
  9. angelmom

    angelmom The love stays...forever in our hearts

    Messages:
    7,376
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    ITA with the brother. Virgin might have been within bounds technically, but they knew it was wrong. They were hoping not to get busted by using it on another continent.

    And just b/c a photographer claims to have the rights to a photo, how can he speak for the model? Don't they have an obligation to make sure that the person featured really did give permission for the photo to be used?

    I hope they get a judgement for enough money to make others think twice about splashing some minor's picture all over the place without permission.
     
  10. TheShadow

    TheShadow New Member

    Messages:
    1,568
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The fact that the girl is a minor presents another angle. A minor cannot legally sign a release. Her parent would need to sign it. So the photographer used her photo without her parent's permission? And then Virgin used it again without verifying that a release was on file? I don't know that it requires damages, but there should be some punitive measures placed on Virgin if they lose this case, to make them not pull this stuff again.
     
  11. englishleigh

    englishleigh Authentic Southern Belle

    Messages:
    7,118
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    LOL...I kinda actually thought she was cute!
     
  12. TheShadow

    TheShadow New Member

    Messages:
    1,568
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I thought she was cute too, but that's really not the point. It's just very disconcerting to thiink that total strangers are looking at your picture without your consent, and then that some giant corporation is making money off your image without your consent. It's a feeling of violation. That's what I felt when I found my photo on that jerk ex's website. It's the same as the feeling you would get if some perv went thru your panty drawer. :(
     
  13. T-Rex

    T-Rex New Member

    Messages:
    1,299
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That's an interesting story. I work in that industry, and I'm pretty sure you can't do that without a model release. (More than pretty sure, actually.)
     
  14. deanws

    deanws Former Member

    Messages:
    11,210
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    She is cute....the "pose" is goofy looking. Did you read what her brother wrote? He said the mother was concerned of her daughter getting stalked. I can see her point there.
     
  15. deanws

    deanws Former Member

    Messages:
    11,210
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I thought that too.
     
  16. Samiya

    Samiya Jason, you're pathetic

    Messages:
    1,003
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I forgot I posted this one. Nah, it doesn't belong in the strange section now that I've read further on it since and know the background of it's use.

    I agree with her brother.

    Maybe she should go into modelling though. She is beautiful.

    As for Virgin Mobile.....shame on you!

    Sami
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice