Discussion in 'Dr. Teresa Sievers' started by beach, Sep 1, 2015.
How did the camera get pointed at the "incorrect" spots of the house? is the question
I agree with your second sentence above, your main point, but I also think the odds of not arming an alarm system are higher than many think when there's a pet sitter involved. I personally had the experience of going over the operation of an alarm very carefully with someone coming in to feed our cats, then having a disastrous false alarm when she "forgot" to bring along the alarm code but opened the door anyway "hoping the code would be written down somewhere inside". Needless to say, we had her leave the alarm off the rest of our trip and never used her again.
However, they didn't have the jumpsuit at the time saliva samples were taken?
Yes, Skinner decided to stop posting and the thread was closed. He did post that his conversation with MS didn't change his opinion that he is innocent.
IF it's even true, I would suspect those that killed her did so.
He said he just came to clarify a few things and may not post again
LE may have known that perps had dogs so they took dna samples from sievers dogs
I was curious as to why the Sheriff has been spending time with the S girls? Could
it be that MS is helping with info? medical books and possible discrepancies, CWW, other employees?
We don't know that it was pointed in an incorrect position for sure.
We know the door was not within camera range
A poster said someone saw MS moving it with a broom
Another poster said that it would not matter where it was pointed, it would not capture that door
We don't know
O.K. to follow up with the logic lets assume the killers did move it. It would have to be someone that the neighbors would not think twice about seeing around the house. After all,MS was "allegedly" seen moving them back. Since the cameras would be filming when they were moved the first time, it had to be someone that wouldn't arose suspicion from anyone who would see them moving the cameras.--JMO
Maybe LE was just planning ahead in case they found evidence in the future?
There's alot we don't know--that's why we are throwing around possible theories
This was my impression too.
Yes thats for sure
We know so very little
I don't think the yelling at 5AM had anything at all to do with this murder. My opinion.
Except the Sheriff had already said no comment when asked about MS cooperating, which definitely implies no
I don't think so either.
based on Duntulum's post, we know that nobody was arguing with Ts at that time.
Why would anyone hang around?
The sheriff doesn't want to address that
It could imply he is not cooperating but for me, its not definite yet
Has anyone been offered a lie detector test?
To me there is a difference, such as last night he was asked if MS a suspect and he said he didn't want to address or speak of that, but several days ago when asked if MS was talking/cooperating the answer was simply "no comment." That was a loaded answer on purpose