Love this theory. Creative and plausible. It works as long as there are no texts, WhatsApp messages, etc. in the State’s possession that implicate Charlie in the hiring of SG and LR. And THAT is the question that has been vexing me for weeks… Are those communications retrievable?Oh yeah, I signed in one day and had a bunch of these notifications. Mods are essential but I don't recall ever relying on some Youtube source as proof for any argument, aside from using CA or WA's own words against them. Head scratcher, for sure.
Speaking of head-scratchers, Katie is still not singing and will now be using a public offender for her appeal. What in the world is going on with this case?
Looking forward to the CA trial. I am mentally preparing myself for the next rabbit out of the hat that the Adelsons will pull at trial. My newest theory is that there is a chance DA will testify on CA's behalf to say that she planned this whole thing with KM and asked CA to deal with her post-bump. Makes some logical sense. Not sure if it would be enough to get CA off but the elderly DA is in her 70s and doesnt have much time left to serve. Which is why I would love for them to file charges against her yesterday. Even if she wins at trial, which I would put at a 30 percent probability, she will have at least had to spend her last years in a jail and in court. Whereas she can never be charged if she has a stroke a dies next year.