Footprints in the basement?

Discussion in 'JonBenet Ramsey' started by halycon, Nov 27, 2006.

  1. halycon

    halycon New Member

    Messages:
    324
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Didn't they say on the CBS program that there were two sets of prints found in the basement? Uh, I thought it was just one Hi-Tec print that was Burke's. Was there another one? Is there a source for this? TIA!
     
  2. Loading...


  3. Jay78

    Jay78 Member

    Messages:
    246
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    I found it interesting that this was mentioned as well. I have read most of the books on the case and I have only seen mention of a single footprint.
     
  4. Charlie

    Charlie New Member

    Messages:
    213
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Perhaps they meant one foot print(burke)the other a palm print(melinda)
     
  5. Solace

    Solace New Member

    Messages:
    4,807
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well, if they did Charlie, they should say that. They should also say the prints have been identified.
     
  6. Cypros

    Cypros New Member

    Messages:
    3,641
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Doesn't "two sets of footprints" mean that there are 4 prints?

    I also found this an interesting point in the show since they merely threw it out there but did not say anything about the type of prints (Hi Tech) nor any of the info already out there about the prints.

    It was a very misleading mockumentary all around.
     
  7. Rhett

    Rhett Member

    Messages:
    348
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    18
    No, but as they were talking about it they showed a picture of the footprints in on the floor. It was flashed too fast to get a good look at it but they had a picture nonetheless.;)
     
  8. halycon

    halycon New Member

    Messages:
    324
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You can get a picture from anywhere. Maybe they took it from another case. 48 Hours does a lot of mysteries. I don't trust anything that was on that show.

    I still want to know -- what second footprint???
     
  9. JMO8778

    JMO8778 ..at the beach!

    Messages:
    5,554
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The second one they're trying to say was there was likely made by a ghost,IMO. ;)
     
  10. Credence

    Credence Member

    Messages:
    565
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    This article was written in 1998 and mentions two footprints:

    January 11, 1998
    Web posted at: 6:48 p.m. EST (2348 GMT)


    The New Yorker also reported that dark fibers found on the body did not match clothing found in the house, and two types of footprints, including one near the body, did not match any footwear belonging to the parents.


    http://www.cnn.com/US/9801/11/jonbenet/index.html
     
  11. Eagle1

    Eagle1 Former Member

    Messages:
    2,832
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    They showed a SET of footprints, rather than just one print? All along we've been hearing there was just one, and I was citing Kahaner's "Cults That Kill" book to theorize someone put a boot on a pole of some kind, maybe a shovel handle or whatever was there in the basement. So was the set close enough to the edge of the mold to have been someone walking normally?
     
  12. SuperDave

    SuperDave Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    13,263
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    There is an article that asserts the second print was John's.
     
  13. Eagle1

    Eagle1 Former Member

    Messages:
    2,832
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yesterday as I was thumbing through a copy of Globe at a checkout, I came upon yet another article about two intruders, which also had something about Lou Smit. There wasn't time to read any of it. If one of the tabloids would print a picture of the footprints, now that would be interesting.
     
  14. SuperDave

    SuperDave Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    13,263
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I think that was the examiner, Eagle.
     
  15. Eagle1

    Eagle1 Former Member

    Messages:
    2,832
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes, you're probably right. So you saw it too. Nothing new, right?
     
  16. SuperDave

    SuperDave Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    13,263
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Not at all.
     
  17. halycon

    halycon New Member

    Messages:
    324
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That crazy story was in the National Enquirer. I saw it a couple weeks ago. I was shocked because I thought they knew the case better than that. More disinformation.......
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice