"G (Guilty)" vs "NG (Not Guilty)" Where do you stand? #2

Discussion in 'Caylee Anthony 2 years old' started by Patty G, Jul 14, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Patty G

    Patty G Retired WS Staff

    Messages:
    16,427
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Please continue here.

    Guilty 1st Degree Murder - Totally Premeditated

    Guilty 2nd Degree Murder

    Guilty Manslaughter - Not premeditated but during a Rage attack or a snapped moment

    Not Guilty - Complete Accident

    Completely Innocent
     
  2. Loading...


  3. ExpectingUnicorns

    ExpectingUnicorns . . . only the pure of heart can see.

    Messages:
    4,248
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Dr G said the tape was applied "before decomposition." I googled every way I could think of and all the results I got agreed that decomposition of animal tissue "begins at death." If that is true then Dr G basically said the tape was applied before death. Dr G did not reveal all in her autopsy report. We have no measurements of anything (including the pieces of tape). We know only the general placement placement of the tape ~ no specifics. While her autopsy reveals many important facts it also omits many. I think she chose her words carefully. . . But I think she and her autopsy will hold up well under questioning. She is highly regarded in her field and this is far from her first trial. She knew when she wrote her report what to expect at trial and I believe that was her reason for her careful wording.


    If the tape was applied before decomposition/death then we do have evidence of premeditation; especially 3, mind you, 3 layers of tape. :mad: moo
     
  4. Marina2

    Marina2 New Member

    Messages:
    2,244
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Bringing over from previous thread:
    In the analysis of the crime scene, the lack or presence of a gun is a fact. We were discussing whether a ME can use other than scientific facts to draw a conclusion as to whether the manner of death is homicide or suicide. When the ME concludes that a death is homicide rather than suicide based on the lack of a gun at the crime scene, he is relying on circumstantial evidence, not a scientific fact. It's circumstantial because, even though it's a fact that the gun wasn't there, there is more than one reason for it not being there. Just because a gun isn't there doesn't mean it never was there. That's why this would be circumstantial evidence of homicide and not a scientific fact.
     
  5. Brini

    Brini Future Irene Adler

    Messages:
    7,522
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yep! Decomp starts the second the blood stops flowing, which is right after the breathing stops.

    If the blood has stopped flowing, there is nothing to stop the ever-present bacteria from doing what they do so well. And, there is no O2 to keep the tissues alive.
     
  6. Marina2

    Marina2 New Member

    Messages:
    2,244
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    She states that it was "clearly" placed before decomposition. To me, this is something she could see with the naked eye, but she didn't elaborate on how she concluded this. It was probably as far as she could go in her analysis without further lab testing. Surely, there's some sort of testing that can take her analysis further and prove placement before death. They brought the death penalty back 4 months after finding Caylee. If it was just the tape and no other evidence related to the tape that made them bring back the DP, why did they wait 4 months? We haven't seen the fiber results from the tape so it's reasonable that there could be other evidence related to the tape we haven't seen.

    I think she's guilty of premeditated murder because of the tape. Not because it's there but because I think there's evidence regarding the tape that we haven't seen.
     
  7. AZlawyer

    AZlawyer Verified Attorney

    Messages:
    7,778
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    48
    A Scientific American article I read recently said 4-10 minutes before cells start breaking down.
     
  8. Mystic

    Mystic Member

    Messages:
    765
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    ty AZ,

    This is what for me makes me ask the question.. if it were an accident, How is it possible in that few minutes prior to decomp where 'normally a mother would be freaking out' about an unexpected accident rationally think or irrationally decide to go run and find the duct tape and bags. I just can not see this logically happening 'in that few minutes' if it were an accident. The moment would be consumed by 'OMG' and 'I need help to save my daughter'. Definately, not I need to get the duct tape, where the heck is it. I'm a layperson and a mother, this makes no sense to me. 4-10 minutes isn't that long of a time to come up with such an idea imo it had to be pre-meditated
     
  9. Jolynna

    Jolynna Active Member

    Messages:
    4,659
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    38
    COURT OF FLORIDA & DUCT TAPING AFTER DEATH

    The Supreme Court of Florida, Brent Robert Huck Case, July 16, 2004

    Ms. Morris was found deceased after decomposing approximately 6 months in a river. Her mouth, nose and eyes were covered with duct tape. Mr. Huck was subsequently charged and convicted of murdering her. Mr. Huck's defense was, "somebody else did it" OR Ms. Morse had expired from natural causes during consensual sex. & Mr. Huck panicked, taped up Ms. Morse and tossed her into the river.


    At trial the medical examiner testified that because of the condition of the body, he was not "one hundred percent" certain of the cause of death. In his opinion, however, the victim died "within a reasonable degree of probability" from asphyxia either by the tape on her nose and mouth or from drowning. The medical examiner found no fractures, entrance or exit wounds, or injuries from a sharp object, but could not rule out blunt force trauma. He found no evidence of organ injuryor disease in the lungs, and found no drugs, poisons or heavy metals.

    According to the doctor, the victim looked to be a normal 22-year old woman. He concluded that the manner of death was homicide.

    Mr. Huck's defense position was that it was improper for the medical examiner to offer his opinions based on a reasonable degree of medical probability, instead of a reasonable degree of medical certainty. There were no eyewitnesses. No confession. There is no evidence the duct tape did cause Ms. Morse's death. The tape could have been put over Ms. Morse's face after death. Mr. Huck's conviction was based on a finding that excluded every reasonable hypothesis of innocence advanced by Mr. Huck.

    Mr. Huck filed an appeal. The court ruled that while Mr. Huck raised numerous issues upon appeal none of them none of them merited reversal of Mr. Hucks judgement or sentence.

    Most interesting and relevant to WS's duct tape debate is that according to the Court of Florida...the assertion that Mr.Huck taped the victim's eyes and mouth shut after she died is not particularly reasonable. The only logical reason to tape her eyes and mouth shut would have been to prevent her from seeing, talking,screaming for help, or breathing while she was alive. There is no logical or reasonable purpose for taping a person's eyes and mouth shut after she is dead.

    As to the second hypothesis, there was evidence inconsistent with death by natural causes, and as noted above, taping the eyes and mouth after death is not reasonable.

    http://www.5dca.org/Opinions/Opin2004/071204/5D03-1906.op.pdf
     
  10. MissJames

    MissJames a yellowflutterby changed my life : )

    Messages:
    6,552
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm sure there were pictures and probably drawings to show exactly how the tape was placed.They just weren't released .I suspect the placement of the tape,more than anything,helped Dr.G rule homicide.
    As I've said before,she has no dog in the fight.She doesn't say who did it,only the manner of death.
     
  11. MissJames

    MissJames a yellowflutterby changed my life : )

    Messages:
    6,552
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You are so right,Mystic.A parents reaction to an unexpected death is to get help and "My child will be okay.My child CAN"T be dead".From my own experience,even after the dr told us ,I kept asking him to keep trying.It just was not possible our son was dead.Now we know our son had did before my daughter found himand all the CPR was useless,but a parent would try. I just can't imagine anyone finding their child lifeless and going for the duct tape instead of 911.
    I've talked to a lot of parents since and it's a universal reaction to an unexpected death IMO.
     
  12. MissJames

    MissJames a yellowflutterby changed my life : )

    Messages:
    6,552
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Man Jolynna,
    you are good.Wish we could sticky this and pull it out every time the "stem the decomp" debate comes up.
    Hope the defense has found this.Maybe KC has seen it in her law research:rolleyes:
     
  13. Marina2

    Marina2 New Member

    Messages:
    2,244
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wow, a Florida Supreme Court opinion stating that it's not reasonable that a person's eye's and mouth were taped shut after death. The only logical reason, according to the higher court, is to prevent her from seeing, talking, screaming for help, or breathing. I guess the jury can legally disregard this explanation if it's given by the defense.

    There are other similarities to KC's case, too. Duct tape comparison, plastic bag comparison, dog hairs found on the tape. The high court seemed to think this evidence was strong.

    Thank you Jolynna. How in the world did you find this case?
     
  14. Balthazar

    Balthazar Active Member

    Messages:
    1,174
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    I think this is a very interesting case, however, this is obviously a couple practicing duct tape bondage (a form of S&M) which is known to be risky and I don't think, because of that, it will apply to Caylee's case. The circumstances are too drastically different.
     
  15. Muzikman

    Muzikman ROCKIN!

    Messages:
    2,097
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Actually, there are a number of similarities in this case, with the evidence collected and examined, and the possible hypos that could be put forth by the defense. I think this is a case that the Prosecution will use elements of, and the Defense would NOT want it used. Some of the defense arguments sound like Baez's reasoning. heh

    I encourage everyone here to download the PDF that Jolynna linked and read it in full.

    I don't see anything about them being "obviously a couple practicing duct tape bondage"

    Bondage was just one of 5 hypothesis put forth by the defendant. Did you read the while thing Princess? Or just skim through it?
     
  16. Jolynna

    Jolynna Active Member

    Messages:
    4,659
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    38
    An S&M hypothesis was presented in the appeal.
     
  17. The Eunice Burns

    The Eunice Burns New Member

    Messages:
    774
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Hi WS......OT Question from a newbie.....

    Where would I go to finish reading the first thread of this topic? (I see this is now #2, and I didn't get to finish reading)

    Thanks!
     
  18. The Eunice Burns

    The Eunice Burns New Member

    Messages:
    774
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Jolynna---Thanks for that post!
     
  19. Balthazar

    Balthazar Active Member

    Messages:
    1,174
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    I read the whole thing.
     
  20. YellowSubmarine

    YellowSubmarine If we couldn't laugh, we would all go insane!

    Messages:
    2,369
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=76250"]"G (Guilty)" vs "NG (Not Guilty)" Where do you stand? - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community[/ame]
     
  21. cecybeans

    cecybeans New Member

    Messages:
    2,319
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Thanks, Musikman for your thoroughness - also, at the very beginning of the document Mr. Huck specifically admitted that the victim "did not have any unusual sex habits, and did not like atypical sex, including choking or other similar activities during sex."

    This statement alone would seen to make a sudden interest by the victim in "duct tape bondage" seem a bit unrealistic as a hypothesis.

    I'm thinking that means it also falls into that category of "unreasonable" doubt.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice