I find it bizarre that a man's frame of mind and interaction with other women - around the time his child died in such circumstances - would be considered (by some) as not being relative to why Cooper is dead.
That's akin to thinking someone like Chris Watts' affair played no part in him murdering his children. He wanted to be free from all responsibilities. Ross would have been free from all responsibility 'only' getting rid of Cooper since he and Leanna were on a level pegging, earnings wise.
I'm well aware of the difference. My point is the mindset. What other way can a prosecutor go about proving that without using evidence uncovered during an investigation?
A serial cheater doesn't = murderer. A sexual deviant with a thing for young girls is a different mindset. Doesn't = murderer either, but the deviant is on a different level.
In the event there is a new trial, Ross's communications on the day will not be excluded, so will be interesting to see what will be 'allowed' outwith that, if anything.
I imagine the sensationalist aspect of a minor's involvement was a factor in the Court's decision. I've yet to read it in full, but will do.
I still believe Ross planned it and sincerely hope there is a retrial.