I wonder if they paid him to consult on the video..... lots of NRA $$ backing this, in MHO.
with all due respect, I dont need to continue reading to know that grass can induce anxiety in all users, chronic or not.
Not unprofessional- deliberately deceitful!! He could have moved the camera any way at all to show the gun. They didn't want to. Cherry picking season- can;t wait till it;s over! IMHO
Uhm A State witness did do it,. Good was a state witness.
Good's statement hasn't changed since he was first interviewed by the police... can you please explain the molding to GZ story?
The defense is opening a door that will bury them.
One of the comments that did not make sense before but is making sense now.
GZ said that TM said "you got me".
It could be that GZ said "you got me" which made TM get up and then GZ shot him. That is why TM was over him and the shot was at an angle parallel.
GZ statements are from the event but altered. He is taking segments of the event and switching position.
He was a defense witness. The State called him before the defense did. The State did this with most of the defense witnesses.
They can go back and forth on this all they want. The jurors will view the 7-11 tape and decide for themselves the difference in height between the clerk and TM. And they have testimony from the clerk that he was 5'11".OMG in heaven, with tennis shoes they are now saying TM was three inches taller (6'2") ....come on already!!!!!!!! IMO, JMO, FGS
Blatant accusations of witness lying/tampering are just that, accusations, with nothing to back them up I might add.
He admitted he just guessed about parts of his original statement. ANd saud he saw things, that in fact- he did not. Perfect guy to consult on this bogus video, huh? IMHO he is.
"Scale in terms of their height." said Mr Shumaker.
Except they were on the ground and the defense, adding in the tennis shoes and negating the fact that the hoodie came off TM's head but is added to his 5'11" height making him a fictitious kneeling height of 6'3"...OMG!!! What an unprofessional presentation. ALL MHO. (If I had a locker I would now paint my own WTF! on it.)
First time use or notwith all due respect, I dont need to continue reading to know that grass can induce anxiety in all users, chronic or not.
Interesting. Since he wasn't "technically" a defense witness (on the stand), can the judge legally sanction the defense?
IMO - I'm not certain about any deliberate deceit -the animator is only doing what he's asked to do - but this is animation regarding a death that involved a gunshot, includes no gun, and is based on ear-testimony, and a witness who's call wasn't used to show where something started, and where it ended based on the defendants' statement. Aside from TM wearing sneakers with 3 inch heels, landing blows with his left, and maybe being able to float above GZ in order for the gunshot work, what is it's intended purpose?
It doesn't seem to prove anything that wasn't said - I don't understand why this is even in court - in my opinion, absolutely.
He was a defense witness. The State called him before the defense did. The State did this with most of the defense witnesses.
And if there is such a thing as BLATANT WITNESS TAMPERING I think Ms. Jeantel and her "Yes Sir" is a good example.
IMO.