Germany/Portugal - Christian Brueckner, 27 @ time of 1st crime (2004), charged with sexual assault crimes, Praia de Rocha, Portugal. #5

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'd guess as Europeans, they'd both have had a decent enough grasp of English. CB certainly has (from the evidence of his letters). Most (travelled) Europeans have English as a second language.

That's beside the point, obviously. It's the specifics in LC's testimony that are making it all very shady for me.
I agree with your opinion of LC's testimony. Hopefully the judge will strike out his evidence as it bears little relation to the cases currently being tried. Who is the creator of all this confusion?
 
I cant see him telling some random person he kidnapped MM tbh

We have no idea exactly how random a person might be to another either in the prison system or in the outside world of crime.
CB had fingers in a lot of pies; perhaps LC did too.
 
I agree with your opinion of LC's testimony. Hopefully the judge will strike out his evidence as it bears little relation to the cases currently being tried. Who is the creator of all this confusion?
The prosecution called this witness.
 
The prosecution called this witness.
Yes, I realise that. You have to wonder why, given what he said in court and how FF was already prepared with a video relating to MM case rather than those currently being heard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mex

There’s something from BZ now .. in case anyone has access .. able to translate ..?
CB allegedly told LC about rapes and kidnapping and also asked if dogs could find bones buried in he ground.
*snipped
"The truthfulness of this must be questioned. In 2020, the witness was questioned by BKA officers in Sehnde Prison and said nothing about these clues to the Maddie case. The representative of the Braunschweig public prosecutor's office pointed this out during the trial."
 
Yes, I realise that. You have to wonder why, given what he said in court and how FF was already prepared with a video relating to MM case rather than those currently being heard.

I'm trying to deconstruct/parse this, Misty. :) Are you saying that you think this LC guy is a Defence stooge? That he was enlisted by the Defence to fool the prosecution into thinking he was a credible witness, just so he could be called and then denounced in court by the Defence?
 
Last edited:
Yes, I realise that. You have to wonder why, given what he said in court and how FF was already prepared with a video relating to MM case rather than those currently being heard.
Didn't FF claim a fellow con was put in with CB to get him to confess, is this the guy.Also I think time and again FF seems to be a step ahead.
 
I'm trying to deconstruct/parse this, Misty. :) Are you saying that you think this LC guy is a Defence stooge? That he was enlisted by the Defence to fool the prosecution into thinking he was a credible witness, just so he could be called and then denounced in court by the Defence?
There is another case going through where the Braunschweig office is under criticism.

 
I'm trying to deconstruct/parse this, Misty. :) Are you saying that you think this LC guy is a Defence stooge? That he was enlisted by the Defence to fool the prosecution into thinking he was a credible witness, just so he could be called and then denounced in court by the Defence?
TBH I'm not sure what is going on and I don't think BKA do either. There was no need for LC to mention anything remotely related to MM case in court today. The fact FF seems to have been totally prepared for it (by asking for Crimewatch video to be played) raises many questions.
 
But it's the paedo to paedo conversations, they like to discuss
maybe but he also spoke to other paedos so what makes this one so special? and why not tell the BKA any of this when originally questioned? after not remembering things this morning even? Even the BKA called his testimony out.
 
TBH I'm not sure what is going on and I don't think BKA do either. There was no need for LC to mention anything remotely related to MM case in court today. The fact FF seems to have been totally prepared for it (by asking for Crimewatch video to be played) raises many questions.

Oh I agree. I'm as perplexed as you are.
 
TBH I'm not sure what is going on and I don't think BKA do either. There was no need for LC to mention anything remotely related to MM case in court today. The fact FF seems to have been totally prepared for it (by asking for Crimewatch video to be played) raises many questions.
it was the BKA who wanted him there though not FF. I am curious as to what he was actually meant to testify about?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
248
Guests online
363
Total visitors
611

Forum statistics

Threads
611,728
Messages
18,285,298
Members
235,465
Latest member
Phoenix Heart
Back
Top