Mrs.A
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2020
- Messages
- 29
- Reaction score
- 330
To me, the conflict shows up because of Tierney's office statement. It makes it seem like the different members of the task force are going in different directions and don't trust each other. Of course, I hope it is not true.I don't want to argue, but I cannot understand your point of view at all.
I don't think Harrison "admitted" to what you said. He just acknowledged that LE is keeping an open mind about this and all information relevant to the investigation.
John Ray was able to get these witnesses; LE was not and even ignored one of them when she attempted to report through crime stoppers. Harrison had 2 choices: ignore the information and let it be "only" per John Ray, or accept the information and improve it by witnessing some of the depositions. This adds a lot of value, because Ray is not in LE/prosecution. Harrison could participate in getting the most useful information from a LE/prosecutor POV. In addition, Harrison as an extremely respected professional who represents LE shows potential witnesses that LE means it (now, if not previously) when they say they want tips.
I'm unable to identify a single thing to lose with Harrison's support of the witnesses that approached John Ray.
But his not supporting these witnesses working with John Ray could mean their information was not as useful to LE because nobody was there from LE to make sure the needed questions were asked. Those witnesses had really potent information. The information could only be made better with Harrison partnering up with Ray.
MOO
Edited to add: it is baseless to claim the info might be straight up BS. The information was vetted by Ray and Harrison.
I also understand why John Ray wants the affidavits publicly discussed since this investigation has been polluted by corruption and dissmisal from the beginning.