As someone interested in the firearms side of this I find the case against her potentially more interesting than the one against AB. Mr Baldwin has not held back in saying specifically what he claims he did or/or didn't do but we've not heard from HG-R as to what she says happened or didn't happen (other than through her lawyer). I'm very interested to hear the specific facts of her involvement and what her actual level of culpability is or isn't.
Whatever her degree of guilt may be will be determined by the courts but, from what I can tell, she seemed to have been way out of her depth as regards her position as armourer. That doesn't absolve her of anything criminal, of course, but she is still just an employee. She has managers and producers above her who are supposed to to be making sure that the people they employ are competent and do their jobs in a safe and capable manner. She is essentially the senior firearms manager but if she's too inexperienced and not competent for that role then the people who are employing her carry a large part of the responsibility, IMO.
It will be very intriguing to discover the precise movements of that gun from HG-R to when it finally discharged the live round and what her role in that was, specifically. I'd also like to hear more about how they think that that live round got into the gun.