I have found much ambiguity within this entire case.
The portion requiring BK's initials in the blanks on the charging doc are seeking to know if BK understands his rights.
The next portion asks him to answer Yes or No to certain questions.
View attachment 397750
Although it may have a much deeper meaning for the suspect, o he is a sly one, the lack of his X in the box means, to me, perhaps, that he doesn't wish to reveal any
possible promises or coercion
"Has anyone made you promises or coerced you to act in this matter?"
Source, Page 2 and 3 https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/case/CR29-22-2805/010523 Notification of Rights.pdf
(acronym att = at this time)
BK was a teacher. IME, he did not overlook the question. He ignored it on purpose and with intentions.