Allabouttrial
Until you've walked a mile in someone else's shoes
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2018
- Messages
- 6,265
- Reaction score
- 53,261
How can we answer all those questions without knowing more facts?. Struggling to make sense of this.This made me think because, yes, obviously, we're all filling in the blanks and deciding who did it, or what type of person did it, but maybe the way to approach this is to see the person you think did it, visualize them, and walk it step by step to the end. Putting the facts we know at this time together to fit the crime, we should all be asking and answering:
how did they prepare? how did they get there? what weapon did they bring? who did they kill first? who did they target? how would LE be able to determine that? how did they escape the scene without leaving a bloody trail? how did they get home? how do they feel now? will they do it again? why?
It's like writing a story. Sometimes you know what you want the end to be, but the end alone isn't a story. A guess at who did it isn't enough. As the process evolves, the questions and answers provide lot of information and they can be convincing. whereas a "the butler did it" is not compelling. Just a late night challenge to all you creative analytical types here.
We're not writing a novel, we're discussing, with the facts we have at hand, theories.
How can you visualise someone committing these atrocious acts from beginning to end when we don't have all the facts?. That's just guesswork.
Also, we can't read someone else's mind as to how they may be feeling. Even all the behavioural analysts are differing in their theories. So, we have no hope.
We can ask questions and offer our theories but no-one can answer the questions with certainty.