Charlot123
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2018
- Messages
- 6,541
- Reaction score
- 43,695
My theory and opinion too. If Xana had locks on her door and it was closed, makes sense that Ethan opened it to investigate and confronted the killer coming down the steps. Ethan is attacked and falls back on the bed. Xana is attacked but puts up a fight. Killer then fleas out the sliding glass door after peering outside to make sure the coast is clear. MOO.
It is the most likely version, but I am wondering about the “house was targeted” situation.
It is an unlikely, but still possible, situation, when someone hides something in one of the rooms. Anything, money, jewelry, whatever. It may not be even the owner who hid it. The owner might even be unaware. The attacker comes to steal the hidden. He goes to room A, assuming what he came for is there, kill the people in Room A, searches and finds nothing.
After that, he goes uprtairs/downstairs in Room B, kills its inhabitants and finds what he was after.
There is no need to go to room C (basement) because he got what he came for. So the survivors are alive simply because he found whatever he was looking for.
In this case, he may, indeed, be targeting not the people but the house, or rather, its contents that are somehow linked to people but hidden in an unexpected place; maybe someone rehid it. And the sequence of killings might be different. He might have started with second floor and went up to the third one when he didn’t find anything on the second floor. Or vise versa. The person who is viewed as “the target” might, indeed, differ from the rest, but it could be merely the representation of the killer’s frustration rather than someone being the target. And maybe in this hypothetical situation, one would expect two people resembling “targets”.
JMO, merely an idea, trying to explain how and when a house might be “targeted”.