Tortoise
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2015
- Messages
- 22,907
- Reaction score
- 107,252
I'm a huge fan of LH, but IMHO she has a bit of a blind spot sometimes when it comes to believing LV. Perhaps it comes from her career as a defense attorney (although I also note she did a spell as prosecutor too), and perhaps I lean too heavily the other way, but when I look at everything LV has done, not just the crimes she is charged with, but her long history of manipulating, lying, devastating others, using people, plotting and scheming 'revenge' for invented transgressions against her, relishing in harming others, feeling no regret or remorse in killing, sacrificing lives for insurance and for convenience, etc etc, I just don't see the same person LH sees. I see malingering in LV going to the mental health facility, as it seems her latest evaluation might have revealed, and incurable severe personality disorders, but not vulnerability or susceptibility to manipulation. I see choices made in lucid mental state, and innate desire to harm others. One who has murdered a string of people including her own children, and would not hesitate to commit more. JMHOLori Hellis thinks that the only Lori's motion that has any chance of acceptance is actually the one we are objecting the most - the motion for a settlement conference. LH points out that it's not necessary for the prosecution to be present and acknowledges some of the prosecution's other reservations (the other attorney becoming a witness, security concerns), but also believes it's an opportunity to get the case settled at all. LH: "The judge might allow some limited or restricted guidelines."
New video:
Settlement of a case must come from a place of realization of one's wrongs, a willingness to confess everything and plead guilty. If LV wants to settle, she knows where the prosecutor's door is.
MOO